Manga is the Japanese equivalent of comics
with a unique style and following. Join the revolution! Read some manga today!
Join #baka-updates @irc.irchighway.net
RSS Feed
How exactly do I feel about this situation? The best word to sum it up would be 'conflicted'. I'm no fan of Lolicon or Shotacon. I don't think they serve any ultimate benefit to anyone whatsoever. However, I also do not believe that anyone has any business outlawing a simple drawing on a piece of paper. I cannot comprehend what possible crime anyone is committing simply by the act of perception--by looking at a fictional representation. It seems no less poignant to me than the debate about South Park's "201". Regardless, this discussion transcends myself. What remains is how we deal with reality.
Let me reiterate to everyone that MangaUpdates does not host manga. We have never and will never host manga on our servers. Our primary goal as a website is to provide information. In fact, we encourage you to buy series that you enjoy, and help out the industry. However, as part of our legacy services, we do provide links to third party websites (when provided by our users) which host unlicensed manga scanlations. This is what I would like to discuss with you today.
With pressure on Japan to tighten its laws on Lolicon and Shotacon, and many other countries including the US blocking the content as illegal, we are faced with increasing pressure and limited options. One, we can do nothing, and risk possible intervention down the line; two, we can remove all links to third parties related to Shotacon or Lolicon; or three, we can remove all content, including series and releases related to these genres. I have created a poll, and I do hope that everyone will participate in making their feelings known.
It seems quite often that after reaching a certain population size, websites will typically find their paths becoming more and more intertwined with that of the prevalent social norms of the time. I know that many of you may not have second thoughts about something as controversial as our topic today, but I ask that you not forget it.
Thanks,
MU Staff
Visit our Genres page for definitions of these genres.
Comments (limited to first 100 replies)
» Identity Crisis on April 24th, 2010, 10:13pm
» Manick on April 24th, 2010, 10:16pm
» Chaoswind on April 25th, 2010, 8:53am
If that is the case, then lets do that...
I mean, I have no problem as long as the group name and a new chapter has been released appear in the Releases page.
» Diokhan on April 25th, 2010, 9:16am
not a fan of loli/shota, but i'm more in fear of series that gets caught in the crossfire all because of a page or two that aren't even heavily explicit.
» LinkMcCloud on April 24th, 2010, 10:19pm
I myself, don't read any of it myself, but removing the genres and series information, may be unnecessary, and will probably remove several miscategorized and well liked series.
You should be able to remove the third party links alone and still argue to be a database website.
Anyway, good luck to us all.
» Achiyugo on April 25th, 2010, 10:09am
» LinkMcCloud on April 25th, 2010, 10:17am
Seriously, if they completely take this, we'll soon be left with nothing but a few shojo and mecha titles.
This site would eventually cease to exist.
» thevampirate on April 24th, 2010, 10:26pm
» VampireBanana on April 24th, 2010, 10:26pm
And then again... now that I recall from various forums I was looking at, Google Adsense has never been very nice to sites which're non "family-friendly" anyways. This includes "sexually explicit" images, "sexually implied" images as well as discussions concerning topics of violence, sex, etc., etc. It doesn't matter whether that "sensitive information" is provided to minors with some warning or blocked from the search bots. As long as any of it exists on that site, well... good luck with Google Adsense.
And also, there's also the possible problem of too many false clicks originating from 1 IP or something like that.
» VampireBanana on April 24th, 2010, 10:36pm
And to even further cement my comments, please read this post. The Google Adsense TOS should have already mentioned the following rules:
http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showpost.php?s=b5a899e55dd92c0430838ef987922535& p=103423&postcount=7
» VampireBanana on April 24th, 2010, 10:46pm
» godhand666 on April 24th, 2010, 10:27pm
In my opinion I say do nothing. This is an information website where one goes to get information. Going to out the way to delete the links to all the groups that have a release under one of these two genres would be sad since most of the groups don't do solely those genres but other non-shota/loli releases. At most maybe not let the release pages not have the "DL" link like how licensed releases go.
» blakraven66 on April 24th, 2010, 11:34pm
» imderekyup on April 25th, 2010, 2:49am
» LinkMcCloud on April 25th, 2010, 10:21am
» dezin19 on April 24th, 2010, 10:38pm
I would have to agree. These are not children's lives being exploited; it's just someones drawings on paper. Loli/shota manga isn't going to turn people into pedophiles and/or sex offenders, and it certainly shouldn't be a crime to host these manga genres.
I, personally, don't read these genres; however, some people enjoy them, and I don't see any harm in that. Now, if they had a case that directly linked some loli otaku to a underage rape crime, then maybe they would have reason for concern.
» vietangelix on April 24th, 2010, 10:38pm
» vietangelix on April 24th, 2010, 10:50pm
We wouldn't have gotten so far if everything gets censored because of some idiots who don't like it. -__-
» Toto on April 24th, 2010, 10:45pm
However, I'd like to make another suggestion. How about disabling cover pages to only loli/shota series? So, we'd still keep the majority of the information on the database but remove some of the objectionable content. Yes, the covers are supposed to be censored, but there are a lot that barely have any.
If something MUST be done, do this and see what happens. Use it as a way to test the waters.
» Scyfon on April 25th, 2010, 6:24am
OR
We can keep going as we are.
People can complain all they want, the release filter was made for a reason. It's not our fault they don't use it :\
If you really wanna remove the links, sure. As long as the scanslators are still credited for. Most of 'em don't provide the link here anyways :\
but yeah... leave it as it is, till there's no other options.
» Serian on April 25th, 2010, 7:51am
To make it shot, it would be simply a shame to loose whole genre, popular series, information because the censorship is too strict.
» babel on April 24th, 2010, 10:56pm
It isn't just hentai-type titles which are being targeted anymore either. When mainstream manga such as Negima begin to fall under the hammer then what is left? The people forcing this issue will never stop. If they get their way with this, then next it could be depictions of violence. I can see the eventual end of most manga productions unless this is stopped.
As far as Google is concerned, they have set themselves up as guardians of freedom recently with their stance on China, so to find them using their power to veto sites through means of pulling advertising is very disturbing indeed. The saying goes: 'with great power comes great responsibility'. Well Google has that power, but I'm seeing very little sense of responsibility...
One of the few outspoken critics of this insidious trend of censorship is the author Neil Gaiman - he's been promoting the Comic Book Legal Defense fund and has been touring and giving talks on the subject. Unfortunately, there aren't very many voices out there for freedom, but many sites like L7world (which is the site I suspect may have started all this), which are drowning them out with their inflammatory blogging methods.
These types of articles, branded 'tabloid reporting' in the printed media world and subject to guidelines and laws, are ironically allowed to be published with impunity on the web it seems- benefiting from the freedom they are so eager to bring to an end.
As far as MangaUpdates is concerned, I'm not in a position to comment on what you should do from a financial point of view: if you can't survive without advertising and can't get advertising except through Google then your options are limited. But if you start censoring your own links, then where do you draw the line? Do you just remove the hentai links? Or do you go further and start censoring titles like Negima too? If you do, then what about 12 months down the line when some Southern states politician looking for an easy vote-winner starts shouting about something else you're linking to?
It seems freedom of speech on the internet is being suffocated. I'm from one of the worst-offending Countries in this matter - the UK. We have recently had a draconian e-bill forced through parliament in a late-night session which scares the hell out of me. What can I do about it? Well, an election is coming up in a few weeks and for the first time in as long as I can remember, I'm going to vote. I'll be voting for whoever is against that bill. It may not be much, but I'm doing what I can.
» mangotango on April 24th, 2010, 10:57pm
» Luciferhawke on April 24th, 2010, 10:58pm
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 8:17am
» Luciferhawke on April 24th, 2010, 10:59pm
» true_grave_unit on April 24th, 2010, 11:24pm
Based on how people are voting, it's understandable why the majority is voting for the "do nothing" option, but it irks me as to how many people don't care about a fairly significant subject...
» Nadorn85 on April 25th, 2010, 4:37am
» crystalsouls on April 24th, 2010, 11:31pm
I'd suggest a fifth option for your pole: Have loli and shota automatically filtered on the site, and only have them viewable if the filter is manually turned off in the user CP. That way only people who are looking to find it can, and there shouldn't be any reason to complain.
» Aleph0 on April 25th, 2010, 4:46am
BTW, how are the chances that Google will reverse the decision even if you remove the DL links? I'd wager quite slim...
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 9:04am
» jadewtch on April 24th, 2010, 11:32pm
Mark things clearly, but don't take anything off.
» loosecannon504 on April 24th, 2010, 11:37pm
tl;dr Don't let the good suffer for the bad.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 9:09am
» Aeremaee on April 25th, 2010, 1:00am
Thank you for letting us give our opinion on this.
» Drahken on April 25th, 2010, 1:07am
» lame2846 on April 25th, 2010, 1:09am
first was fictional rape then fictional children
I wonder what next yaoi/yuri or gore?
» Chira00 on April 25th, 2010, 1:11am
In my opinion, I think this site clearly identifies titles that may have content that one would not wish to read and also allows the users to block those genre. I do not see the need to do more.
The only other thing you could consider is making users identify their age and thus limiting access to certain genre. Of course, this does not prevent a user from lying about their age to gain access.
There will always be people out there complaining about something.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 1:13am
For myself, the addition of the disclaimer was far enough. An option to be able to turn off disclaimers after the first viewing would be a welcome addition for registered users. Right now it feels like a nagging grandmother is hovering over my shoulder every time I see it pop up. If I wanted a filter, I would have used the user CP. Removing the acknowledgment that the content is legal within the country would also be appreciated. In many cases, it is illegal to read loli, shota, hentai or even yaoi but it should be fine to state the facts about who wrote it, published it, scanlated it, etc.
Removing download links would be a minor inconvenience but it may benefit the scanlation groups as it will likely raise traffic to their sites. Many groups complain that visits to their sites, blogs and channels have steadily declined after all. DDLs tend to change and die so people should spend the three seconds to visit the scanlator sites anyway. If removing the DDLs does not negatively impact traffic to MU too much, I say go for it.
Removing links to the scanlation groups' sites and releases or removing the genres/entries altogether is overboard. MU is an information site. Cutting such info out will leave holes all over related genres, primarily hentai and ecchi series, damaging MU's usability and credibility as a comprehensive manga catalogue. If the site gets turned into Swiss cheese, it wouldn't matter that alarmists have stopped pestering MU because the site would already be dead.
I am not a fan of the default filtering option proposed by crystalsouls. The issue I have with this approach is that it will alienate the anonymous population which for the longest I and many others were a part of. For me, being able to access all the info in the site without logging on is one of the biggest conveniences offered by MU. Keeping the disclaimers and giving people the option to shut them off should be enough. If it is implemented though, I wouldn't lose much sleep over it. At least it will negate the need for those annoying disclaimers.
» Enternalfir3 on April 25th, 2010, 1:13am
» rainexoxo on April 25th, 2010, 1:18am
» rainexoxo on April 25th, 2010, 1:23am
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 9:18am
» voraciouszest on April 25th, 2010, 1:24am
Though I am not a fan of or advocate for the exploitation of children, I have read some decent stories by decent mangaka who treat their topic with maturity and decency. The same thing goes for controversial story lines such as rape, incest, sexual fetishes and domestic violence. That being said, there's always two sides to an argument. I've also regrettably seen many stories which treat these themes as nothing more than cheap and graphic smut.
Truly, it baffles me that people and corporate sponsors take such offense to minors in sexual situations, but ignore in large the overwhelming amount of other topics that can shock, sicken and horrify the public. This mainly concerns websites such as E-hentai.org which host a variety of sexually explicit manga with graphic representations of things such as rape and S&M to more outlandish and stomach-churning fetishes like scatology.
Well, for me, I have to say that I want people to see it as an all or nothing situation. My opinion? Keep the site the same as it is now, by all means. I've never once been forced into looking at anything I didn't want to see through this site. My only suggestion is that perhaps you could introduce a warning for uninformed readers on the page about the level of graphic content. Let people decide for themselves.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 9:35am
Having poll option for users asking if a series has adult content, is graphically violent and is morally offensive on each info page would be interesting though. It would definitely add value to the site if it could be fit in.
» TheLittleE on April 25th, 2010, 1:25am
I think that speaks for itself. I think you should just leave it alone.
And if you do decide to purge all of the material, you are going to have to really look at every series. Not every manga tagged as lolicon/shotacon happen to be adult material.
» Brda on April 25th, 2010, 1:29am
» tion74 on April 25th, 2010, 1:47am
» tactics on April 25th, 2010, 2:19am
If you're just removing the download links, it shouldn't be such a problem to how we use the site. We'd just have to go to the scanlators site, which if anything, is good for them. Also, by taking some sort of action, it shows that we're trying to cooperate, and not just shrugging it off and throwing it back in their faces. Whether the action you take is good enough for them or not..well, it's a gamble either way.
Removing the genres and information is a bit OTT. I don't think such measures need to be taken. Not yet anyway :/
» Aikanaro on April 25th, 2010, 2:21am
» mattai on April 25th, 2010, 2:32am
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."
If people cave in to this kind of thing, it'll just get worse.
There is NO reason to ban adults from viewing images of fictional characters, no matter what the hell they happen to be doing.
» gringe on April 25th, 2010, 2:39am
Couldn't you just... remove the shotacon and lolicon genres from the database without removing the series themselves? Most "loli" or "shota" series have other redeeming qualities or genres that apply to them, so if you don't advertise them as being lolicon or shotacon, might that get rid of the problem? The reason I bring it up is simply because, where do you draw the line and decide what's a loli/shota series? L7world listed Omamori Himari as an example, but if you're familiar with the series, it's clearly not a loli-focused series. Would REC count as lolicon because Aka looks young? But she's 20, and it's not unrealistic for people to look like that at 20, so that'd just be sexist. Of course, Australia recently banned certain smaller breast sizes from pornography so maybe Aka would be considered a loli by some...
But anyway, that's my thought.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 9:50am
» 668 on April 25th, 2010, 3:00am
» dragon695 on April 25th, 2010, 3:06am
» BlueCheese on April 25th, 2010, 3:10am
» derpMonster on April 25th, 2010, 3:41am
next they'll look at yaoi and yuri and say - I don't really see how anyone can justify that stuff. Get rid of it all.
then they'll look at shounen ai and shojo ai and say - I don't really see how anyone can justify that stuff. Get rid of it all.
then they'll look at seinen and josei and say - I don't really see how anyone can justify that stuff. Get rid of it all.
then they'll look at ecchi and harem and say - I don't really see how anyone can justify that stuff. Get rid of it all.
then they'll look at shounen and shoujo and say - I don't really see how anyone can justify that stuff. Get rid of it all.
slippery slopes are dangerous.
i humbly vote - keep the info - disable adsense on those sites - remove the legal warning thing - and remove the dl links.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 8:01am
» Odrin on April 25th, 2010, 3:31am
» derpMonster on April 25th, 2010, 3:51am
» RilleL on April 25th, 2010, 3:35am
Now is not the time to "stand your ground" and show big daddy how tough and stubborn you are. The future of MU may hang in the balance. You don't need genre to tell you about loli/shota, you can just read the manga itself.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 10:05am
Don't fool yourself by saying censorship will stop attacks on MU. As I've repeated many times now, the alarmists do not care whether MU removes the loli or shota from the site. The values in Japan are different from the values in the rest of the world and scanlations are at best legally dubious. They will simply find another thing that offends them and continue to persecute MU until it is driven to the ground.
» Freelance on April 25th, 2010, 4:07am
That way this site would remain advertisement friendly.
» derpMonster on April 25th, 2010, 4:13am
» Mini_Twilight on April 25th, 2010, 4:07am
Given the sensitivity and controversy of the subject, I think information on groups scanning and translating the material should remain, however direct links to their sites should be removed. If a person wishes to access such material, the onus is on them to then manually find the group involved. In this way, MangaUpdates is not directly providing such sites with traffic and cannot be accused of doing so.
» DFC on April 25th, 2010, 4:25am
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."
-Pastor Martin Niemöller
Perhaps a solution could be reached, simply by separating the site into a hentai/normal database. However, by giving in to these unreasonable demands would be too much. How about I remove your right to worship some fictional character under the subset of religion? How would you feel huh?
» dreamer00013 on April 25th, 2010, 4:38am
Anyways, MangaUpdates shouldn't erase a part of its information. It may be better if there really were a second website for all hentai-stuff or lolicon/shotacon stuff. But whenever I find a name somewhere and want to search for it because I'm absolutely clueless & curious, I want to know which genres it has. So it would be absolutely great if there was a saying a là "If you want to know more about this series which includes the following genres:"", please visit this website, where you will find more information."
Would that be an option?
» Chibi-Chibi on April 25th, 2010, 4:53am
As one who back in the day studied to become kindergarten teacher, having this profession now and having professional experiences with children I am entirely against children porn.
However i think that trying to erase lolicon/shotacon manga/anime/doujinshi is totally senseless. Priority of people who are making decisions should be in preventing the actual crime (ie adults taking out their sexual frustration on children) instead of trying to ban something that is drawn. Drawn images are exactly that, drawn. (For sake of future generations i hope that in most cases are) Pictures based on imagination and not reality. And that is exactly the was reader will see them. As much as pedophiles as such make me sick i'd rather see them fapping over lolikon manga than do some hunting at neighboring school.
Leave it as it is, at best i could go with what the first comment said (erasing the DDL that can be found here). Going along with this "lets censor the internet and RL" will hurt humanity on the long run. I'm not actually expecting that censors will not happen, the only thing we can do is delay the process.
I guess nobody can really learn anything from out history. Censoring literature happen in the past already, until people snapped and stuff happen. I guess this world really is doomed <_<
» NightSwan on April 25th, 2010, 4:54am
If they start removing lolicon/shotacon, what's next?
Personally, I won't cry if there's none of it, but other people enjoy it and it's their right.
I'm against censorship.
Where does it end?
My opinion is that no action should be taken.
To be on the safe side though, I agree with the link removal - and I vote for that.
At least until things clear out (if they do).
Other than that... MU is an information site.
» unya on April 25th, 2010, 5:09am
» tc-man on April 25th, 2010, 5:52am
» Konbanwa002007 on April 25th, 2010, 5:36am
Would just a single character or scene lead to the censors crying out "loli/Shota" to a perfectly decent series?!
» Xadro on April 25th, 2010, 5:48am
Its not real so why censor it? We dont live in China or something like that, why do we have to censor something that doesnt hurt anyone and isnt real.
» piyochama on April 25th, 2010, 6:06am
But until then, I totally support a removal of such stuff. Not a big fan anyways, and its really not that big of a loss (how big is it, as a percentage of releases anyways? like less than 5%?)
» za3bola on April 25th, 2010, 6:21am
Not to mention that there are sexual predators who prey on young children and who are very likely using these mangas to fuel their obsession and may well even trigger it.
Z
» tnt_tnt on April 25th, 2010, 7:13am
"When people are exposed to any sort of media for a prolonged period of time, it becomes accepted and part of the norm,"
we would defiantly not want anyone walking around with violent thoughts, would we? More importantly why would anyone enjoy violence in a manga?
We could go on censoring all kinds of genres because of those kinds of reasons. However if one is able to discern the different between a fictional world and reality then it should be ok.
I think it is fair to think that you're never going to stop people from doing things that aren't appropriate and censorship combined with repression doesn't help.
That said the previous comments with reference to an 18+ system similar to Anidb's could work well. Ok we all know that it is not going to stop people under the age of 18 who really wish to view the content as people lying about their age on the Internet is the norm.
However I strongly believe that as a site that provides information only censorship is a down fall of the sites raison d'être.
» JustPassingBy on April 25th, 2010, 8:32am
» jinx_you on April 25th, 2010, 7:04am
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 7:47am
» hika-kun on April 25th, 2010, 7:20am
Sides, this is a work of fiction. People should see it as it is, there's no guarantee or proofs that by reading a shotacon/lolicon manga, people will get affected and turned to a bunch of pedophiles. Also, there are lots of title that have loli/shota faced adult character.
For those of you who don't care, please think if it's your favorite genre, whether it's shoujo/josei/seinen/yaoi/yuri/etc else.
» pearlized on April 25th, 2010, 7:21am
Also, I'm sure there are some titles mislabeled as shota/lolicon that aren't.
Though if this is what is causing the funding issue, then I'm not sure what's best to do.
» Romashk on April 25th, 2010, 7:45am
This is an information site. And cutting out a chunk of information isn't right. imho
» grumpiepeechas on April 25th, 2010, 7:47am
» bmxer911 on April 25th, 2010, 7:52am
» poptart on April 25th, 2010, 7:56am
now, my thought on this is that all links be removed but the information be left up there and we still have the option to filter those titles out on the release page. i cant say how much shota/loli is here as i use the filter option, so i don't know how much work that would be :/
but most importantly i still would like to be able to search for a title and be able to see if it is shota/loli so i can avoid it.
at this point only new comers would be unaware of where to find things and if they (the shota/loli crowd) really feel left out they can make their own database to find releases with links. not to mention the blogs, lj coms, and forums that are already dedicated to it i'm assuming, since there are such things for other genres.
keeping the information, yet removing the links seems like the best compromise to me. people can still be informed, they just have to not be so lazy and copy,paste,search for the actual website.
my question is, for sites that release various genres would they also be in line to have their website links removed?
» Ravenstar on April 25th, 2010, 9:51am
I completely agree with this stance, which is why I voted to remove links and retain the information. I would, however, make people search for the sites themselves.
» shaggievara on April 25th, 2010, 8:02am
» JustPassingBy on April 25th, 2010, 8:25am
» o0James0o on April 25th, 2010, 8:48am
» Amagasa on April 25th, 2010, 9:21am
» lynira on April 25th, 2010, 10:00am
Also, I just wanted to say that I think the policy about explicit images that we have right now is fine the way it is.
» drunkguy on April 25th, 2010, 10:22am
I disagree with the elimination of links to scanlator sites, especially the wide swath that you've listed. I'm surprised you didn't include ecchi, genderbender or harem. Most sites do more than just one genre of manga and banning them for hosting controversial stuff is just insane.
Say for instance a lolicon site is hosting the latest scanlations of your favorite manga. Would you have the scanlators banned from posting new scanlation info or shown on the site without mention of it also being primarily a lolicon site? Of course you won't do either. MU should to keep people informed.
- MANGA Fu
- News
- What's New!
- Series Stats
- Forums
- Releases
- Scanlators
- Series Info
- Mangaka
- Publishers
- Reviews
- Genres
- Categories
- FAQ
- Members
- API
- MEMBERS
- Sign Up
- TEAM-BU
- Admin CP
- About Us