There are no bad or good clichés, I think. Most of the times it depends on how the author delivers them, don't you think? Take for instance, how the seme rapes the uke and eventually they fall in love:
it's obnoxiously cliché, yet we accept it better if portrayed with some sort of "reason". Either way, here's a few
:
"No, stop" actually means: "yes, please do me."Being a cute dude will get every straight guy on your pants.
Seme totally knows what he's doing even if it's the first time with a dude.
There's no need for lube - let's face it: the uke gets wet everywhere.
No condom.
Everyone is gay or will turn gay for the uke.
Girly, naïve, oblivious, good-for-nothing uke.
Seme is the hottest s-hit in town.
Girls are either evil or arranged to be married to seme/uke; otherwise they don't exist.
It's really easy and quick to pour your heart out and be happily ever after.
As for the
seme and
uke roles, from a female perspective, I'd say this is the "no-brainer" cliché because it's a matter of sexual identification, that's why they're there for. The more yaoi you read, the more clichés you encounter, the more you want to run away from them. But the seme/uke roles is pretty much a given. I wouldn't mind reading more BL with reversible couples, but could it possibly become the norm? Is that what the average fangirl is looking for when she goes to BL, provided that the yaoi demographics is mostly female? I don't know.
I'd say that in 98% of the cases I feel attracted to the seme (which would make me the uke,
) and that kind of connection, I guess, plays a significant part in the reading too...
________________
It's the Art of Time, it's the Art of Life--
Of the player and the craftsman,
Of the writer of songs, of the creator of love,
Of those who will follow, of those who led,
There's no other way in the world ahead ♥