Quote from asmageddon
Except necrophilia, zoophilia and furry(?) are fetishes, while homosexuality is an orientation and something you are born with and by no means a deviation.
While furries are simply weird and imo should be accepted like anything else as long as it doesn't cause others harm, necrophilia and zoophilia are both highly controversial if not straight-out immoral because, well, in second case you're (obviously) doing it without consent and in first you're doing something greatly offensive to the dead and his/her family/friends/colleagues and introducing a risk of getting a disease you might inflict people with later on.
Besides, how do you even imagine marrying something that isn't even a person? If dogs or cats were sentient then sure, go on and allow marriage between them and humans, why not? But the problem is that they're not and they can't understand or consent to marriage
While furries are simply weird and imo should be accepted like anything else as long as it doesn't cause others harm, necrophilia and zoophilia are both highly controversial if not straight-out immoral because, well, in second case you're (obviously) doing it without consent and in first you're doing something greatly offensive to the dead and his/her family/friends/colleagues and introducing a risk of getting a disease you might inflict people with later on.
Besides, how do you even imagine marrying something that isn't even a person? If dogs or cats were sentient then sure, go on and allow marriage between them and humans, why not? But the problem is that they're not and they can't understand or consent to marriage
uh huh. yeah. So you're saying that if a zoophile walks into an LGBT meeting and says "I'm persecuted cause I'm in love with my dog" all of them should stand up and call him a monster or abomination or sexual deviant.
Uh huh.
You realise that is EXACTLY the same treatment that gays were getting from a lot of snotty gay bashers some time ago?
Or exactly the treatment that white black intermarraiges were getting back before the american civil war?
What gives YOU or anyone the right to say "oh... this case of being different is an orientation and normal but THIS other case is deviance and perversion"
And who is to say that what is deviance today doesn't become a social norm tomorrow?
Did a little research, and unlike homosexuals, zoophiles have not had the benefit of research projects to test whether it was something they were born with or some deviance that they picked up over time.
As for consent, er, well, if a woman starts doing naughty stuff with a male dog, and the dog mounts her and xxx xxx xxx, that's pretty much consent on the dogs part, right?
Also, the Greeks evidently had nothing against interspecies sex, which is why there's so many myths of offspring from human+animal, god+human, god+animal, monster+human, etc etc. Gods that were worshipped at the time too, not gods that were looked down on. IIRC there were various roman emperors that had sex with animals too.
Also, let's not forget something that I and almost all of modern society finds criminal: pedophilia. BUT, as mentioned earlier, it used to be legal in the past, and it is STILL legal now in certain parts of the world. And the "civilised" part of the world pretty much says "we sort of frown upon this, but it's up to your own countries laws to do so, and we will respect your culture and laws and religion and turn a blind eye to it"
So, is pedophilia natural or sexual deviance? ... huh. Don't think any studies were really done here either.
Anyhow, I personally decided to just let everyone have their freedom as long as it doesn't hurt anyone and I'll ignore the "morality" part.
Oh, BTW, that means that I also do not approve of "common" things like if a guy is cheating on his girlfriend without her knowledge, I'll let her know about it. ... whereas if I hear of some gay couples or I meet a dendrophile (makes out with trees), or whatever, it's none of my business...
Very unusual moral compass? Maybe. But I'm not confident enough in DNA and hormones and whatever to pass judgement based on "naturalness" or not so I just go by whether it's harmful or not...