In the first chapter there's a scene where a commoner thug is about to force himself on a noble lady. When the main character, dressed up in a suit, looking like a noble to that thug, intervenes, the thug says, and I quote, "Nobles can't hurt commoners, you know?"
I'm sorry, what? Does the author not know what makes someone an aristocratic noble? That's literally the opposite of the concept of aristocratic nobility. What makes them nobles is the ability to manage the territory and dole out punishment in order to ensure things are being managed correctly (in the king's/emperor's/etc. eyes, at least).
This author read other trash fantasy and isekai stories and used them as inspiration without even understanding their abused tropes.
Tangent (feel free to skip what's in the spoiler section, it's not part of the review):
Authors like this getting published is why I think the industry is bloated; and there are so many. It's also why I view the general writing of manga to be as follows: Up to the end of the 80s, manga were perfecting one or two things. The 90s to around 2010 were written by authors who understood those perfected elements and combined them into arguably the best era of manga writing.
2010 onwards saw the best era manga but didn't understand the individual elements from that era as much as they should have, and thus included them in often bizzare and nonsensical ways, though with creativity that usually made up for that. This generation is full of authors that saw the creativity of the previous, took out only what they liked the most (an unintentional deconstruction) and don't have even a hint of foundation in their writing.
And the publishers and (often enough) readers let them get away with it.
Keep in mind, I'm saying manga in general, not all manga from those generations. There are brilliant works in all generations, but looking at the overall landscape is how I come to the conclusions I come to.
And if that's true—nobles not being allowed to harm commoners—then the son of the lord who attacked the main character earlier in the chapter, should be going to jail or too afraid to directly attack the main character the way he did.
And that's not even getting into how convenient/fast the noble girl being assaulted scene was. Its was literal seconds after the main character teleported into the capital city.
I'd say the art is middling, so there's nothing to really hold my attention now that I know the story is going to be bad in the future: no one writes logic that bad and finishes a story without major plot holes later on.
I'll continue to read a few chapters just to see if the author smartens up and changes things, but if this review remains unchanged after a week, it's because the story didn't show me it was going to improve from what I've already said.
Edit: Yeah, it only gets worse. It's like a trope speedrun, with convenience and contrivance introducing them one after another. The main character's personality also conflicts with the plot, and as a result, the only thing done differently compared to other slop—the main character not being a pushover—goes away as soon as the plot needs it to.
I don't recommend this one, as it's not in "so bad it's good again" territory.