The Family Zoo

Just don't. I don't know why I was in the mood to read this even seeing the comments other people made, but now that I've read it, I don't know what to do with humanity. Seriously. Don't.

Was this comment useful? Yes

Hilarious

by yui-kun
14 years ago

Rating: 10.0 / 10.0

Probably not to everyone's taste, judging from the ratings and comments, but this was really funny. And if this isn't your thing, you'll most likely be revolted. I'm not into incest or scat, but the story is so out there that the weird and disgusting situations just end up funny.

... Last updated 14 years ago

Was this comment useful? Yes

the mangaka is weird!!

by spiritedaway
15 years ago

Rating: N/A

this manga is prety amusing/interesting. its the first time ive ever read a manga as weird as this. undoubtedly some readers will find this disgusting and an utter--fail!!

but if you have some spare time, you might as well read it if you want to try something new. i dont really care if this manga is stupid weird unethical atrocious or immoral. as long as it entertained me iam good.

a rating of 10 for its distinctiveness

warning: you will notice yourself cursing at every panel...^^

Was this comment useful? Yes

WHAT THE HELL

by Anderjak
15 years ago

Rating: 10.0 / 10.0

When I started reading this, it seemed innocuous enough. A family that gets reincarnated as zoo animals. Weird, yes, since they still have the mentality and schedule of the human race. Okay.

Then it gets WEIRD.

I couldn't tell you if my mind started collapsing BEFORE or AFTER I see an elephant father taking a crap into the toilet grandfather's mouth while talking about how girls use way too much toilet paper. It is the single most WRONG thing I have ever read. The story flows into these absolutely horrifying "gags," and the timing couldn't be better executed when it comes to scrambling your brain.

I'm giving this a ten for the plain and simple fact that it is a perfectly harmless message wrapped in one of the most foul things you'll probably ever read. Seriously. Count how many times you say "WHAT THE HELL" or something similar in your head or out loud as you read this. Just keep count.

I got to THIRTY-SEVEN.

Was this comment useful? Yes

*scrubs brain*

by akari_mizunashi
16 years ago

Rating: 1.0 / 10.0

Some people confuse "comedy" with "the most disgusting, awful thing I can think of at 3 am." The creator of this manga is one of those people.

Now, I'm no prude. If you can make poo-eating and interspecial incest funny, go for it. This doesn't do anything funny with its ridiculous "jokes". They're just there. And they're terrible.

... Last updated 16 years ago

Was this comment useful? Yes

That was very weird...

by Toto
17 years ago

Rating: N/A

It makes you think about what the hell was going on in the the authors' heads to create something like that. I don't really know how to rate that. I really don't. It's got very warped originality, and somewhat of a moral to it... with an amoral portrayal.
They were definitely trying to say something and disgust everyone all at the same time.

Was this comment useful? Yes

Grotesque

by Shostakovich
17 years ago

Rating: 7.0 / 10.0

When I finished reading this story I felt like I had a fever and felt the urge to rinse out my mouth - it's the most nauseating manga I have read since Shintarô Kago's 'Dance! Kremlin palace'. Though, while this is not my cup of tea I think it's an inspired and brilliantly driven tale, and so I'm rating it this positively.

Was this comment useful? Yes

Hmm.

by Jooles
17 years ago

Rating: 1.0 / 10.0

The one thing I remember about this is the dialogue between the toilet and the toiletee before doing the number two. Far worse than even Shintaro Kago (?). Utterly disgusting.

Was this comment useful? Yes

Overall Impressions

by holy`bell
18 years ago

Rating: 1.0 / 10.0

This is the first atrocious one-shot I have ever read. There are some poor ethics featured in the story and I am appalled by it. Yes, it was my choice to read it due to my curiosity and I would not want to revisit this one-shot in the (near) future.

... Last updated 18 years ago

Was this comment useful? Yes