lol, the idiot is here as well!? Are you stalking me or something? tl;dr, hey,I don't use a spellchecker like you, weak grammar Nazi, so forgive a typo or two, and I think I am doing quite well with how fast I am typing and the fact I don't have my glasses on; moreover, I am in a hurry. Also, they are different than misspellings, dolt. You want to teach Me proper grammar, faggot? Try to pick battles you can win, will you? By the way, I wouldn't think an ignoramus would know this, but capitalization can be used for emphasis. Go back to the whole you came from, wanna-be snob. You look like you were raped in the ass hard, Pathetic Fool.

Last edited by Seijurou at 7:18 pm, Apr 22 2012

________________

Take it to a PM.

________________
A just ruler amongst tyrants

Ok, ok, Lamb. :/

Was fun. : D

Let's duel once more, later on, Seijurou.
Like Real Men, erect dicks everywhere, so much man.

Are you sure you aren't at least bisexual, seijurou?
It sure seems like you're butt-hurt to me.

tl;dr, I don't ever use 'sweethear' or honeybunny;' stop pulling homo stuff from your ass.

@kaer-something: you like thinking about guys' butts, huh? Homo . . .

@Cresh-something: Not religious; insects come from wholes.

Whatever, I am not going to bother with brainless animals anymore.

________________

Going back to the 'whole I came from' sounds like it has a religious connotation. So... poser-atheist?

That said, I just found it funny that you complained about inconsistencies in the writing habits of others while yours is clearly so riddled with bizarre eccentricities (arbitrary capitalization, by the way, hasn't been used that way in several centuries, but I can't say you're completely wrong, as it was once upon a time). Perhaps others find that amusing as well. Who knows.

________________

Reviews of my Work:
You are kind of boring - Blackorion
Congratulations! Ur an asshole! - tokyo_homi
Your awesome!!! - Cherelle_Ashley
NightSwan also said that she wanted to peg me, once, but I'm not sure whether to take that as a compliment or a threat...

I'm perfectly fine with locking this if this sort of stuff continues

________________
A just ruler amongst tyrants

Actually, I've always wondered what there is to "respect" or "disrespect" regarding sexuality... Or why people find it necessary to avoid/attack that which is different, take hair/skin colour or faith for example. This goes both ways, I've seen queer people bash heterosexuality just as much as the other way around.
Why even bother spending all this energy on something as basic and useless as "hate".
It shouldn't be necessary to "fight for equal rights and acceptance", it simply is and has been since the dawn of time. Is power of someone else's happiness so important?

The odd thing is that queer folk (or people pretending to be) are a mayor fetish to both men and women regardless of sexuality, especially lipstick lesbianism seems to thrive in the porno industry.

Is it envy? is it fear? is it guilt?
I'm wondering what the source of all this "hate" is, for I imagine homophobia is only a symptom of something that is most likely not related to sexuality at all.

Another thing, do people see a difference between homosexuality and homoromantic?
Because to me those terms are miles apart. Someone could easily love women but prefer sex with men. (or prefer to have no sex at all).

Ah well, if the internet has though me one thing, it's that people don't need a cause to be horrible or offensive.

________________
Who they, what are, and why?
- Manga Cover Database -

well said


what i think of homosexuality:
first of all i should probably mention that im a religious person and homosexuality is not accepted in my religion...but thats where the story ends
i wouldnt judge any homosexual, or anyone with different morals/beliefs/ideals for that matter
i wouldnt judge any other human because im a human myself. im not flawless, im not perfect, therefore i dont have the right to judge anyone
im perfectly fine with people being homosexuals, being a homosexual doesnt make you any less of a human than i am
i wouldnt force my beliefs on anyone. thats all.

Most people don't respect a sexuality that strays from the road because it isn't 'natural', meaning the process of life, and 2. it's different and some people are mentally disturbed of it. To me it's like natural selection. Two gay men can't make baby, thus their genes are forever gone (unless they give sperm away). Maybe it's natures way of cancelling out certain genes that could be problematic (?). Also, as the population rises I think there will be more homosexuals. Control population.

Contrary to that, come to be an apocalypse with a few amount of people on the earth, there will be no time for homosexuality. Nature isn't going to produce it. Well ... that is entire subject... meaning if a person is born or choose... but I think when people are attracted to their own gender something is missing, they aren't meant to reproduce.

If you look at it in a 'liberal' view, it's okay to be homosexual. But if you look at in a natural view, it's not okay because it prohibits from continuing genes and evolution.

Another thing that controls population are AIDS and other sexual viruses. People are so liberal today they sleep with anyone. I guess it's a good thing to keep the sheep under population (I'm imagining that's what people at the top say.) In a way it's stupid though to think people should sleep with anyone ... sexual liberty is a double edged sword. That is why homosexuals have a bad grip with society too by the way ... just like anything there are monogamous homosexuals but it seems like this emanates because society makes it so.

Since when has homosexuality not been a part of nature? In the wild homosexuality is extensively studied within over 400 species and observed within 1500 species. That includes Japanese macaques, penguins, lions, bears, leopard seals, bonobo monkeys, orangutans, American bison, bats, geese, dolphins, orcas, ducks, and black-headed gulls just to name a few. Homosexuality and bisexuality have been observed across insects, mammals, and birds, but homophobia is only found in humans. So what's unnatural? Please don't go spouting things as if they are coming from a scientific perspective when there is just so much science cannot define, and boiling everything down to the genetic level is one of the greatest mistakes I believe science to have. There is a species of geese that two males will chase away a female after mating with her then raise the eggs together with only one male being an actual father. His genes pass on but the other partner's does not, yet, they raise the chicks together as a pair. One species of birds has females that pair together with their nests reaching sizes twice that of male/female pairs and demand much more effort to feed them. Their eggs are smaller and the chance of survival is lower, but they continue as a pair anyways. What benefit is that to their species? Since those relationships are abundant within that species? Homosexuality occurs in nature therefore it is natural. Don't go labeling something as such without understanding what it is you're talking about. Leave genetic and scientific theories to the scientists, bro, and just learn to respect others.

<--Libertarian.

I'm not against Homosexuality but i need to say this: It "is" against nature "because" in animals homosexuality is just "for fun", they are more bisexual than homosexual. It's normal to have sex with the same sex, what could be seen as anti natural is making another male (in case of a male) your parter, animals that do that were considered to be sick since it could be blamed on abnormal levels of hormones, but it is not called a sickness right now due to the homosexual community saying it wasn't right to do so.

So saying that two persons of the same sex getting in a stable relationship is "against nature" is not actually wrong.

You are now confusing the act of sex and the intent of reproduction.
Spawning offspring has NOTHING to do with sexuality.
A very important point you seem to have slighted, is love.
Love has nothing to do with sex, gender, or the act of sex. (and sometimes sexuality). I hope I need not mention that love is not an exclusively human emotion.

What you probably mean to say is, that since homosexuality does not contribute to the proliferation of a species, it is therefore "against nature" (who are you to decide that, and what is this "against" nature...?).
If so, it appears we have differing views on what is life in general and what is important.


So since in times past scientists thought that sexuality was related to a hormonal imbalance, homosexuality could therefore be classified as a disease (humans are also animals)... This has long since been disproved (although sadly still believed by many).
So it was not because the "homosexual community" thought it to be offending, but because it simply is incorrect.

________________
Who they, what are, and why?
- Manga Cover Database -

You should at least do a little fact checking before making claims that are, in this case, complete nonsense.


edit:


No one said natural was the same thing as "good". Though the "unnatural = bad" approach seems to be common among homophobes.

Last edited by mattai at 4:31 pm, May 1 2012

________________
"It is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."