I thouhgt your pictures where funny and entertaining, but it's true you only use them to denigrate me and they don't hold much sense and aren't good arguments either.
At least I
am not susceptible.
Pumpkin has been polite and fairly logical in her arguments
Yes, I've always been polite to you and you're not imagining how hard it can be with all the bullshit you're saying.
Actually I'm gonna stop a little bit with beeing polite and say what I think: How old are you? Definitely not 23 as you say. Which crappy school let you pass your philosophy and sociology classes?
Pumpkin has been fairly logical in her arguments while you've yet to give a single logical argument but instead have only been attacking her.
Keep in mind that (assuming you've read through our entire argument), my main problem is with her initial statement
So, because my initial statement didn’t please you, you felt the right to personally attack me the rest of the convo. Mature.
We have hairs on the pubic area and on harmpits because these are parts of the body that tend to warm up a lot more and cause sweating.
And here I thought they tend to warm up a lot more because hair grows in those regions as a part of human evolution to keep us warm during the time when we didn't have proper clothing and central heating wasn't a thing.
Okay, let's evaluate your argument:
You say hair grow there to keep us warm as part of evolution. Wow, sure, everybody knows that your fucking armpits are the most important regions of your body so they have to stay warm thus evolution did this special treatment. No, just no, dude.
Hair stayed on our heads for this reason (to keep it warm)
It couldn’t possibly stay on our armpits for that because they already warm up a lot alone cause they are closed areas and they aren’t, as I said, a part so important that it would be absolutely needed.
Don’t you think chest area would have been a better idea? Because there is the heart, lungs, and all important organs. Yet, we don’t have as most chest hair as armpit or pubic hair.
So why did hair stay in these regions? For the exact reason I repeated and repeated and repeated. Hygyenic and natural heat control by sweating reasons. And I already explained it to you many many times. You are the wall for not wanting
to understand. If you have the memory of a gold fish, go read back what I wrote previously.
She won't accept this explanation because it isn't one that is neither scientific nor is it coming from a member of her Feminazi party.
I’m right to reject an argument that is not scientific. It means it’s not proved.
It looks I know more about evolution and science than you do
You definitely are a man who hates Feminist. And the main reason is because you know nothing real about them. Plus, I already explained that I’m not a real engaged feminist but I respect some values they defend and I’m not a feminist as you see them: hating men and saying they’re superior. First, this conception is false. Second, I love men. :3 Third, I defend equality for both gender and I never put one gender above the other.
But you know, I’m getting tired of you. I already talked long enough about it.
My job here is mostly repeating things I already said. Go read my previous comments, again. You decide to ignore what I say, you decide to rejects my arguments, you decide to stay dumb. You put a great show.
people THINK that it's more hygienic to shave, but it's not
I think it's more hygienic to shave because it prevents me from allowing more surface area for bacteria to be trapped and grow (and thus causing MORE body odor)...but apparently it's not.
Sigh. That too was already debated longly. Go read the previous comments! God, you never learn.
And if you want to celebrate a bit, I’ll recall you that I admitted being partly wrong when I wrote that and I changed that quote for a more veridical one. It’s true it’s hygienic not to shave, but shaving could also be hygienic.
The hair role is to hold the sweat to let it evaporate after and let your pubic area and harmpit warmness cool down. When you shave, your sweat can't be held by hairs and is absorbed by your clothes and so, you have no more cooling! So, you sweat A LOT more.
Because, you know, clothes that soak up your sweat instantly dry up and not hold on to any moisture whatsoever, and that having more ventilation does not help you keep cool.
Because sweat that is held by your hair is protected by an Omega class force field that prevents clothes that comes into contact with them from absorbing said moisture.
Because we all wear skin-tight clothing 24/7.
You are deforming my words. A kind of argument a 10 years old could come up with.
-What I said is true, the phenomenon of evaporation induce cooling. The hair keep that phenomenon near your body.
-Clothes don’t instantly dry up, but the phenomenon of evaporation is further from your body
-I never said clothes wouldn’t absorb sweat if you have hair, but at least, hair help
-You are totally inventing the skin-tight clothes sentence out of nowhere
But apparently making analogies is an alien concept in Quebec, so she misread it and assumed it as me calling hairy people "animals", to which I made a simple ASCII image of her missing my point.
I perfectly understand analogies, but it was a bad one and that’s why I answered like that, to make you realise.
Nothing happen for no reason in evolution. If we still have hair, it’s for a reason. Now, you can decide to follow the mode if you want, it’s your own very choice. I was just talking about the benefit of keeping them but you don’t HAVE to if you don’t want to because, hopefully, keeping your hair is not a matter of life or death so if you follow the mode or not it’s okay. There was a time people were shaving their eyebrows because they thought it was ugly to keep them (just like right now with pubic and armpit hair). I could have talked about the benefit of not shaving your eyebrows by saying they are important and protect the eyes. You could insult me all you want and say it’s not true, it stays scientific facts. Yet, following the mode or not would be your choice.
Is that comparison enough for you now. I think I made myself really easy to understand.
I agree with everything 狂気 said
Back at you dodge master, but you know, you don’t have to answer. I think this conversation lasted long enough. We all said what we had to.
Sorry again for the delay, I have a job in summer where there are no computers. =)
@ qwkimmy: Well, arguing on the internet can be an interesting pastime as long as you don’t take it too much at heart and stay cool. =) It can also become a loss of time, but oh well, I had nothing important to do today. =)
Variety's the very spice of life, That gives it all its flavor. -- William Cowper