Political Compass

16 years ago
Posts: 1901
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.36
Its not surprising. I've been aware of my communist-leaning anarchistic ideals for a while now. Its nice how I am snuggled so perfectly with the Dalai Lama. 🤣

16 years ago
Posts: 2126
Ecoming Left/Right ; 2.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian; - 0.87
Jeez, I'm certainly not very extreme... I'm practically in the middle.
Does the walker choose the path, or the path the walker?

16 years ago
Posts: 87
Quote from BoxBox
yes, and using those questions to define left right Authoritarianism and Left Right liberal is insane/
Actually the whole concept of contrasting libertarian and authoritarian is quite awkward. Or you can be B. O'Reily and redefine terms however you like. lol, I'm kidding, I like O'Reily, he's cool
😀 😁 I'm merely remarking on the irony of the test.
Can you explain why using those questions to define your political ideology is insane? I don't understand the point you are trying to make. They explain the differences at the end of the test and it makes perfect sense.

16 years ago
Posts: 2275
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56
Oh, BoxBox.... the terms you are looking for are Socialism vs. Fascism.
[color=green]"Officially, this machine doesn't exist, you didn't get it from me,
and I don't know you. Make sure it doesn't leave the building."[/color]

16 years ago
Posts: 137
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.23
Suprisingly much more liberal than I thought.

16 years ago
Posts: 520
Economic Left/Right: -2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.38
Libertarian Left, which is pretty much what I expected.
Economic Left/Right: -4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28
And that is it.
This week's favorites:
ççççççç[Ô.Ô] tsutopodus© will eat your manga and steal your cats!

16 years ago
Posts: 310
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.49
I don't understand how I got zero, so I guess I'm not left or right haha. I'm apparently libertarian which is actually what I thought it would be.

16 years ago
Posts: 367
Left Libertarian
Economic Left/Right: -4.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.23
I'm somewhere near Gandi Nelson Mandela and Dalai Lama?? ¬.¬
Do not feed the trolls
[img]http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/5526/fireproofbyevilbug.jpg[/img]

16 years ago
Posts: 1668
Warn: Banned
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.36
Wow....did not expect that actually
Quote from xxxillusionxxx
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.49I don't understand how I got zero, so I guess I'm not left or right haha. I'm apparently libertarian which is actually what I thought it would be.
High five!
Quote from you_no_see_me_
this is not about cannibalism...please get back on topic
Quote from Toto
I think it is exactly the topic. I see nothing wrong.

16 years ago
Posts: 617
Libertarian Left, just a bit to the right from gandhi. 😲
But of course this doesn't really concern many Americans anyway, since the only choices they have is a far rightwing guy, or a bit less rightwing guy, either choice being a moron.
Though now they have elected someone who seems genuinely intelligent. But I will reserve judgement untill his first term is up.
Do but despise reason and science,
The highest of all human gifts -
Then you have surrendered to the Devil
And must surely perish. - J.W. von Goethe

16 years ago
Posts: 3120
I have a feeling that this quiz might be biased...

16 years ago
Posts: 458
According to the way those axes were labeled, the majority of us are anarchistic communists

14 years ago
Posts: 1668
Warn: Banned
Quote from ExzyruSxxx
According to the way those axes were labeled, the majority of us are anarchistic communists
lol, i could never grasp the concept of a communist anarchist. I mean I see their goal is the same, utopia, but the way they approach it is different. That's what makes them different.
Communism wants a dictatorship of the working class ruled by an elite class of high moral officials who will take away all rights and redistribute everything and in a sense correct errors they see as social problems caused by previous government. The process involves a heavy authoritarian rule and obvious human rights violation. BUT apparently human rights won't be violated IF the governing officials know what's really good for the people. So Marx obviously derives this part from Rousseau's social contract where it says if the sovereignty is legitimate, then anything the government do, no matter how wrong it looks, is obviously good for the people, and therefore is an legitimate action. Then, when they feel society is ready for utopia, the government will dissolve by itself over night and bam, utopia.
Anarchism, at least classical, talks about trying to achieve utopia by abolishing all government and then, somehow, spontaneously due to human nature and the ethic and moral we all hold, we would come together as an Utopian society. A very complex system develops where we would elect leaders but the leaders must change every now and then, say 1 week period, so prevent accumulation of power. AND no one, including the leader, shall be treated higher or differently. So no more holy bush cut out board from the Jesus camp people, lol. Then of course, the role of the leader, instead ruling like an emperor, is to actually lead. Surprise! The leader must listen to the people and their desires and opinions, then the leader must formulate ways to motivate the people to achieve that goal. In a sense, the leader does not make the decision, the people does, the leader only guides the people to their goal.
As far as I know, anarchism seems much more compatible with the theoretical democracy but only small tribal groups around the world has even come close to this degree of democracy. US is far from this. In fact, the US is a constitutional republic with indirect democratic process.
Of course, a lot of people doesn't think anarchistic government form is possible for large nations. It worked well in smaller tribal groups and smaller regions, maybe a town size, but a huge nation or a state....that's a very complex system you have to work out and it's not possible now.
Quote from you_no_see_me_
this is not about cannibalism...please get back on topic
Quote from Toto
I think it is exactly the topic. I see nothing wrong.
Shockingly, most of MUers all Libertarian Left.
*EDIT: put the wrong link, mine is economic -1.88 social -1.13