Ask the opposite gender

16 years ago
Posts: 438
I consider experienced as how many different ways you have tried it, because a committed long term relationship can yield more experience than multiple short ones. But I think the term "experienced" for most people refers to how many different people you have been with.

16 years ago
Posts: 2128
Quote from Raeryn
The previous questions had me wondering this, so I have a question for both sexes:
What do you consider to be "experienced"? Is it the number of partners, the duration of being sexually active, or other?
I, myself, have only been with four partners, does that constitute as being inexperienced? Or does the fact that I have been with at least one of them for years and have done just about everything, relieve me of that title?
Experience is relative, Rae.
Depends on who's asking or who you're asking the question to.... answers will vary for sure.
At the end of the day, we're all inexperience compared to that old geezer with 20+ wives that lives in Timbuktu. 🤣
Quote from mams
Quoting for everyone to read a second time so that
it stays in their heads forever. Thank You, Mams.
Point & Squirt

16 years ago
Posts: 1138
Your opinion might change when you're older and have had 10 boyfriends already.
I highly doubt that, I've already had my share of experience. And whether it was a serious relationship or not, at least it lasted and it had nothing to do with sex, I assure you.
Like I said in my previous posts guys choose sluts/whores (whatever you wanna call them) over the right girl. You guys have pretty much proven that. Might be because they are idiots or you can just blame hormones.
And before anyone goes insane, I mean some guys, not all.

16 years ago
Posts: 438
Quote from G-17
Quote from Raeryn
The previous questions had me wondering this, so I have a question for both sexes:
What do you consider to be "experienced"? Is it the number of partners, the duration of being sexually active, or other?
I, myself, have only been with four partners, does that constitute as being inexperienced? Or does the fact that I have been with at least one of them for years and have done just about everything, relieve me of that title?Experience is relative, Rae.
Depends on who's asking or who you're asking the question to.... answers will vary for sure.
At the end of the day, we're all inexperience compared to that old geezer with 20+ wives that lives in Timbuktu. 🤣
Or Hugh Hefner

16 years ago
Posts: 1138
Quote from G-17
Quote from Raeryn
The previous questions had me wondering this, so I have a question for both sexes:
What do you consider to be "experienced"? Is it the number of partners, the duration of being sexually active, or other?
I, myself, have only been with four partners, does that constitute as being inexperienced? Or does the fact that I have been with at least one of them for years and have done just about everything, relieve me of that title?Experience is relative, Rae.
Depends on who's asking or who you're asking the question to.... answers will vary for sure.
At the end of the day, we're all inexperience compared to that old geezer with 20+ wives that lives in Timbuktu. 🤣
I'll have to agree with G-17 on this one. Experience does vary...
Quote from ironskintribe
Or Hugh Hefner
🤣 Makes you wonder though; he's been building the playboy empire for more than half is life, and he spends most, if not all of his time in his mansion, we all know what he's doing. Maybe he's learned a few things here and there but who are we to know 🤣
Yes, are all indeed inexperience compare to him.

16 years ago
Posts: 1619
Whether or not someone was experienced (in any sense of the word) didn't matter to me in the slightest. It so happens that I was never with someone who was a virgin, but I wouldn't have minded if any of them had been.
An online friend of mine who didn't want to be a virgin any longer chose to have a one-cruise-stand with a woman whom he knew he'd never see again. He chose her specifically because he'd never see her again, and she was willing to be gentle with him and instruct him so he'd know what to do. Had I ever been with a virgin, that's exactly how I would've been.
Why didn't he want to be a virgin anymore? According to him, he wanted to make sure that when he did find the right girl/woman, he would be able to please her without the insecurity of not knowing what to do. And he was becoming self-conscious about his age. He was around 20 at the time. (I think he thought that the older he got, the more likely he was to find someone who would have more experience than him, and he didn't want her to think him inept - he's a shy guy by nature. Not certain of this though. It was over 5 years ago that this happened.)
If you've ever thought or said "Nice Guys finish last" and really meant it, then you should probably read this LJ post by DivaLion. It's incredibly insightful whether you're male or female.
From a bumper sticker I like:
"If you're gonna ride my ass, at least pull my hair."

16 years ago
Posts: 1310
Quote from Mamsmilk
Quote from G-17
Quote from LunaMay
[quote=grandexeno][quote=Mamsmilk][quote=grandexeno][quote=Chaoswind]For a serious relationship guys do prefer the less experienced girls
lol and where does this come from? 🤣
From the land of delusions.
high fives[/quote]
Um guys he said a serious relationship. Unless you're okay with having a serious relationship with a girl who has done more than 10 guys from a girl who probably only had sex/experience with 1 or 2 guys. If you choose the former than I wonder how serious a relationship you're looking for or how long it will last for that matter. 🤨 [/quote]
Your opinion might change when you're older and have had 10 boyfriends already.
[/quote]
Quoting for everyone to read a second time so that
it stays in their heads forever.[/quote]
As I said I like to teach/corrupt and I guessed that was quite normal...But now I feel like a rare breed... Oh well I guess being a teacher is one of my attitudes.

16 years ago
Posts: 2342
Quote from LunaMay
Quote from KennEH!
Quote from LunaMay
Do guys like girls with more, or with less sexual experience then them? same applies for relationship experience.
Both have their pluses. The more she knows the better at sexing she will be. Though on the other end someone with little knowledge can be "taught," equally satisfying. The ones who know it all, but cant or won't do it is where it sucks.
Seems like guys like girls with experience. Somehow I always thought that guys would prefer virgins over non virgins because it's more arousing, form what I've read anyway. I guess I was a little off there. 😐
Ugh. The whole virgin thing means one of two things. Tighter, assuming the can tell the difference. Why will they say it then? It brings me to the second reason, purity. The fact that he was the first is a huge turn on, more than actual sex. The at also can umbrella over firsts in anything sexual.
Remember though, it may be different in a relationship and after sex, but sex for a guy is more psychological and women are more psychosocial.
Let me add that willing shy girls are huge turn on, but hugely rare. Also that someone on the same page as you can be nice, but usually seen more often.
Finally something I really should have mentioned. I'd rather have a new station wagon than an old and used sports car. 🤣

16 years ago
Posts: 372
Quote from KennEH!
Let me add that willing shy girls are huge turn on, but hugely rare. Also that someone on the same page as you can be nice, but usually seen more often.
This statement is full of truth.
I am not prostrate. I am looking at the sky on the other side of Earth.
You should totally Join Vagrant Scans. No experience necessary.
You should also totally read this cool blog.

16 years ago
Posts: 54
Well I kinda skipped many of the previous posts so forgive me if I say something that has already been mentioned.
To cut straight to the point I have a question for girls and guys in general. When you talk about people around you "giving hints to you" what exactly are they? I tend to be rather dense so I can't tell a "hint" from an ordinary gesture.
Please someone clarify this 🙂
True victory does not come in defeating the enemy in battle, but in winning the war before the need of one.
Sun Tzu

16 years ago
Posts: 1138
Quote from MasterOfMagic
To cut straight to the point I have a question for girls and guys in general. When you talk about people around you "giving hints to you" what exactly are they? I tend to be rather dense so I can't tell a "hint" from an ordinary gesture.
I can never tell when someone is dropping hints. Maybe I'm just a bit slow there or I just don't care for what you're hinting either way I prefer guys to be straightforward.
But I guess touching someone provocatively counts as a hint for both sides.

16 years ago
Posts: 385
Quote from Pirate1019
Quote from KennEH!
Let me add that willing shy girls are huge turn on, but hugely rare. Also that someone on the same page as you can be nice, but usually seen more often.
This statement is full of truth.
Eh, I kinda agree and I kinda don't. Shy girls often act cute and have something unknown/mysterious about them but once you get to know them better, you find out that alot of times they're shy cause they're insecure/ are awkward socially. Plus, outgoing girls rock.
Also, sorry Pirate, I forgot all about the advice I had... real loss I know 🤣
MasterofMagic: I'm pretty dense about these things as well so good question. I think I can usually tell but I'm never sure so I never act on it. Apparently there were a couple girls that were dropping hints on me when I was in the last 2 years of HS and they were really obvious to everyone but me 🙁 Kinda sucks cause I was sorta interested in 2 of them.

16 years ago
Posts: 372
Quote from shade449
Eh, I kinda agree and I kinda don't. Shy girls often act cute and have something unknown/mysterious about them but once you get to know them better, you find out that alot of times they're shy cause they're insecure/ are awkward socially. Plus, outgoing girls rock.
Better than someone who fakes it for the attention.
I'm not fond of overly social girls (or guys for that matter). I can't keep up with them. Social interactivity saps me of my strength. I'm that guy that falls asleep in public places.
MasterofMagic' question: A shovel to the face. I'm that dense.
I am not prostrate. I am looking at the sky on the other side of Earth.
You should totally Join Vagrant Scans. No experience necessary.
You should also totally read this cool blog.

16 years ago
Posts: 385
Quote from Pirate1019
Quote from shade449
Eh, I kinda agree and I kinda don't. Shy girls often act cute and have something unknown/mysterious about them but once you get to know them better, you find out that alot of times they're shy cause they're insecure/ are awkward socially. Plus, outgoing girls rock.
Better than someone who fakes it for the attention.
I'm not fond of overly social girls (or guys for that matter). I can't keep up with them. Social interactivity saps me of my strength. I'm that guy that falls asleep in public places.
MasterofMagic' question: A shovel to the face. I'm that dense.
I actually don't know too many people who can fake being outgoing if they're shy. I mean, most people are shy because they can't be outgoing right? In fact, I might be the closest I know to that since I'm an introvert by nature whose learned to be extroverted for fun and profit.
But I agree, faking ANYTHING is bad. I've just known more fake shy people than fake outgoing people. Although, I've known some outgoing people who were fake/deceptive about other things and I really dislike them so meh.

16 years ago
Posts: 1353
Quote from KennEH!
Finally something I really should have mentioned. I'd rather have a new station wagon than an old and used sports car. 🤣
This comparison of girls to cars is dehumanizing and disrespecting to me.
😔 I believe people should be evaluated in individual terms and based on many aspects of theirs. You would probably consider a girl who has had lots of anal sex and oral sex with many partners but no vaginal penetration to be "purer" than one who has had 1 or 2 serious relationships with constant vaginal sex when both don't talk much about their previous experience (they have the right not to). Isn't that a bit sad? IMO, none of them is purer than the other one or less pure than one without any sexual experience. People are humans, not objects. As to the tightness issue, I'd say it really depends on the person not on their experience when they are still young. When you are able to tell the slight difference of who's tighter, would you consider yourself a used sports car? And did you know there are girls who don't want "used sports cars"?
Did you think your theory on purity could be derived from some unspoken social influence rather than pure truth? That's the reason why some men become psychological about sex the way they are. But it's a bit stupid not to think things and be influenced (subconsciously or not) from different angles in today's world. However, I am sure that doesn't apply to you. So you can only speaking for yourself.