New Poll - Marrying a Manga Character
13 years ago
Posts: 61
Probably not a point to think about it too much. This one may be a bit over the top. Seems more focused on people whose sole love in life is the 2D world.
13 years ago
Posts: 171
I'm not too partial to getting paper cuts when having "sex" :lol:
To those who didn't choose "No, I don't date fictional characters," don't you people know real people you'd rather marry or date or whatever? Life must be pretty bad if you fantasize or desire being with a cartoon over a real person... I can understand if you're 10-years-old or something, but otherwise it's just plain sad, especially if you're an adult. I'm no Casanova, but I'd rather go out a bang a hideous fatty than wish I was with a cartoon chick. Imagine if people really had eyes like that. Creepy! Now, fapping to them is a different story (but the eyes MUSTN'T be huge) :lol: It's the acts they perform which is attractive IMO, but that's neither here nor there. I'd rather be with someone who doesn't have G-cups, pink, wild hair and grossly inaccurate, massive eyes. I guess it's just something about a study I read where people find babies cute due in part to their larges eyes in comparison to their head and some connection between sexual attraction, but I can't remember the details. Now, every time I see huge anime eyes, I think of that study. Not to mention it's a cartoon ffs!
-No longer do I quote great scholars, the famous, etc. Kids feigning wisdom ruined it.
--I wont type a post like a college report. If you don't read it just for that reason, you don't have to post why your hoity-toity ass refused to. I swear, so many people on this site are so full of themselves. A lot seem to think they always have an "intelligent and/or logical" point or show signs of a superiority complex. They never admit they're wrong. Maybe partially, but excuses abound! :\
-Stop mailing me about my comments. I don't read them.
/sigrant
Such a bimbo-rific reply. At least work out your small brain to think of more than four words to say. Oh, wait - you just got another text. Time for some ADD.
13 years ago
Posts: 61
And where exactly did that come from?
Do I really need to explain that one?
'People like big eyes' ----> 'Babies have big eyes' ----> 'Sexual attraction results'
13 years ago
Posts: 61
That wasn't really the point of his post though is what I meant.

13 years ago
Posts: 49
Babies don't have big eyes. They have big heads. Babies are born with almost adult-sized eyes, so that is may seem like they have big eyes when in reality it's their heads and other facial features what are disproportionally big compared with the rest of their bodies.

13 years ago
Posts: 636
You're not making any sense at all. I don't see how you could possibly claim they have big heads while simultaneously claiming they don't have big eyes. Both are big relative to the baby and small relative to an adult.
"It is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
I know. I just didn't like what he said, such as the last words. He sounded immature.
I like where this conversation is going. I agree with mattai. You are being contradictory here. If babies had big heads, they wouldn't be perceived as having big eyes. That doesn't make any sense. Besides, their heads grow in time.
Ah, science . . .
13 years ago
Posts: 23
If I ever can't hold a job and live in my mother's basement, sure.

13 years ago
Posts: 55
The 'u mad' defense? Yawn. Try harder next time.
No need. You are proving my point simply by replying.

13 years ago
Posts: 45
Actually, they do 🙂 That's why gay marriage is becoming legalized in so many states! And if you want to know where the feminine girls are going.. they're waking up and realizing that straight men are overrated and dating other feminine girls! After all, feminine girls ARE the best, so why wouldn't we want to date each other?