Site Poll - Chat Box 88 - Harem Dating

15 years ago
Posts: 1701
ahahaha~ ^^;
The outgoing type!
15 years ago
Posts: 130
Quote from Mamsmilk
Sounds like you are a douche, Jooles.
Lay down those collars.
This thread is about harems, not about
flings.If being man is the most illogical thing to do,
then I'd rather not follow such dumbass standards
for hive mind pride.
Ease up on the typos there, tiger, no need to get agitated.
This thread is about multiple girls/guys at your disposal (a.k.a. A harem.), and whom you would date (if any/if you'd choose), which is exactly what I'm talking about.
But I'll play along - I'm "illogical", and your logic works. Let me see if I got this straight.
It's "illogical" to tell the truth about the fact that you're seeing other people, and logical to do it in secret.
It's "illogical" to respect a woman enough to know that she deserves/can handle the truth and choose whether or not these are acceptable terms, and logical to somehow see this as treating women like dogs.
It's "illogical" to use "Enter" sparingly, and logical to write every post as haiku. (They're pretty good, though. I guess - I never got the fixation with surrealism in poetry.)
Truthfully, you've actually almost got me convinced. But tell me, what exactly is it that you're proud of?

15 years ago
Posts: 3120
Quote from Jooles
It's "illogical" to tell the truth about the fact that you're seeing other people, and logical to do it in secret.
It's "illogical" to respect a woman enough to know that she deserves/can handle the truth and choose whether or not these are acceptable terms, and logical to somehow see this as treating women like dogs.
You've not heard of anger?
Unexpected. In this day and age.
I've seen no mention of dogs before this statement.
But Mams, how many sisters would you need for a harem? I fear for your mother.
Thank you for your initialization, Sagaris.
Could you please point me where I do wrong
to grammar?
There is nothing to be proud of in a harem,
therefore I would not date any of them.
It is not fun, it is not convenient.
It is a pain in ass if there is any kind of
romantic feeling to it, as life is not
a dating simulator where one girl/guy
is picked and then that's the end of it
while we listen to a cheesy pop tune.
It stops being a harem
when one starts to pick favourites,
since it will eventually evolve into
some sort of intimate relation between
the lord/mistress of the harem and the
favourite pet. The pet would act like a
brood parasite and get rid of the rest to
achieve victory.
As for the nature of man,
it's a different thing to be a man in the
biological sense, as in having a hard time
passing a chance to get laid than to act
according to some macho alpha male ideology
and play a role to fill the ideological expectancy.
The illogical part is to ignore the drama
that is born of such carelessness
as letting feelings get to the point
where the other person starts to
have demands and grows out of the
role of a minion. This naturally will not
happen if there's no such principle
as a relationship.
This drama however should by no means
even be let loose in the beginning.
Harem is no harem if the subservients involved
in it aren't dedicated to the person
"in charge" of it, as in, the postulate being
us answering this poll. The ideal level of romance
in it is to show them all equal amounts of love
without making them feel like tools, but
still not making them believe that they are
special.
Here's a haiku for you.
Like horticulturist mows the lawn,
I carefully maintain the garden of liaisons.
No stubbles, naught soil lumps.

15 years ago
Posts: 3120
After reading that long post. I've realised.
Harems are Marxist societies.
You must not let the bourgeoisie corrupt it.
15 years ago
Posts: 130
Quote from Sagaris
Quote from Jooles
It's "illogical" to tell the truth about the fact that you're seeing other people, and logical to do it in secret.
It's "illogical" to respect a woman enough to know that she deserves/can handle the truth and choose whether or not these are acceptable terms, and logical to somehow see this as treating women like dogs.You've not heard of anger?
Unexpected. In this day and age.
I've seen no mention of dogs before this statement.
Anger? As in "them being angry because I always have others"? Never. Not if you're frank about it right from the start. There is no foul play, no lies, no secrets. They might not be content with the rules, and will ultimately try and bend them, but if they want awesomeness in their lives, and everybody does, they will play.
And when they want off the field, they still stay to watch the rest of the game. Because I was upfront and never misled them.
(Yeah, tell me about it. I have no idea what that collar remark was about.)

15 years ago
Posts: 3120
Quote from Jooles
They might not be content with the rules, and will ultimately try and bend them, but if they want awesomeness in their lives, and everybody does, they will play.
And when they want off the field, they still stay to watch the rest of the game. Because I was upfront and never misled them.
What's a word that combines obstinate and egotistical?
You know how douchebags pop their collars, don't you?
At least I'd expect that you do, since you can use
shift for other things besides exclamation and question marks.
15 years ago
Posts: 130
Quote from Sagaris
Quote from Jooles
They might not be content with the rules, and will ultimately try and bend them, but if they want awesomeness in their lives, and everybody does, they will play.
And when they want off the field, they still stay to watch the rest of the game. Because I was upfront and never misled them.
What's a word that combines obstinate and egotistical?
No idea.
Let me hear your take on all this. Namely, secrets and monogamy.

15 years ago
Posts: 22
I'd choose the last option. I'd rather date someone i like more than someone who likes me 🤣

15 years ago
Posts: 2342
Mabe not at once, but I would totally date all of them, for a liitle while at least.

15 years ago
Posts: 23
Quote from Sagaris
What's a word that combines obstinate and egotistical?
I think that narcissist would be an acceptable word,
since the speaker appears to believe that they are the best experience woman can ever have and that he can get any woman he wants. So, said individual must believe that they are an amazing specimen of humanity.
P.S. It's amazing how people can take someone's words out of context. It's that twisting of words that make politicians disliked by many. 😲
Oh, to ring that neck, let me count the ways... >:-(
15 years ago
Posts: 130
Quote from lessaandflar
Quote from Sagaris
What's a word that combines obstinate and egotistical?
I think that narcissist would be an acceptable word, since the speaker appears to believe that they are the best experience woman can ever have and that he can get any woman he wants. So, said individual must believe that they are an amazing specimen of humanity.
"Best experience women can ever have."
"Any woman he wants."
"Amazing specimen of humanity."
Thanks for the compliments, but that was all you. Never said anything of the sort - you chose to interpret it as such.

15 years ago
Posts: 1444
i wouldnt date anyone!!!
but..
i will make advance son all if them!! mwahahahahahahaha!!!
because...
i they found out that im dating all of them they will quarrel and at theend they will found out the bitch that is i... 🤣
oh please do click this!
The sweeter the apple, the higher the branch. The quieter the fart, the nastier the smell.
GUESS WHO??

15 years ago
Posts: 437
I wouldn't date anyone. It would cause too much jealousy around me if I were to choose one. XD
Have them as more than friends and less than boyfriends. Sorta. XD
"Beware How You Take Hope From Another Man."