bannerBaka-UpdatesManga
Manga Poll
Β 
mascot
Manga is the Japanese equivalent of comics
with a unique style and following. Join the revolution! Read some manga today!

RSS Feed

The in-depth manga/hwa/hua rating guidelines and your thoughts on it.

You must be registered to post!
From User
Message Body
user avatar
The Azure Veil
Member


2 months ago
Posts: 1

I've come across various ways people would often rate series, but it doesn't always come under a clear criterion. I understand that most of it is biased,, but the the majority lacks a lot of structural form. I myself, when I first started manhwa, it was The Gamer. I rated it really highly years ago, but after reading hundreds of other series, I can no longer value it the same way, aside from the sentimental aspect.

The closest I've seen so far to a standardised criterion is the 10-point rating system, which uses decimals. I'll explain how I interpret such values. Please let me know what you think.

πŸ“– Rating Guide (0.0–10.0)

πŸ”΄ 0.0 – 1.9: Abysmal

0.0–0.4 β†’ Completely unreadable, broken art/story, offensive without intent, no redeeming quality.

0.5–0.9 β†’ Almost non-functional; might be a random mess of tropes/art that makes no sense.

1.0–1.4 β†’ Barely coherent; only thing keeping it above 0 is legibility or one salvageable trait.

1.5–1.9 β†’ Still terrible, but at least has one idea or character that could’ve worked.


🟠 2.0 – 3.9: Very Poor

2.0–2.4 β†’ Low effort, inconsistent art/writing, shallow worldbuilding.

2.5–2.9 β†’ A few interesting concepts, but executed very poorly.

3.0–3.4 β†’ Still bad overall, but you can see glimpses of potential.

3.5–3.9 β†’ Flawed but maybe enjoyable if you really like the genre/tropes.


🟑 4.0 – 4.9: Mediocre / Below Average

4.0–4.4 β†’ Forgettable filler; you wouldn’t recommend it.

4.5–4.9 β†’ Weak, but has enough consistency that some people may enjoy it casually.


🟒 5.0 – 5.9: Average

5.0–5.4 β†’ Standard; nothing special, nothing awful. Purely middle-of-the-road.

5.5–5.9 β†’ Slightly above average; has some fun arcs, art, or ideas, but overall generic.


πŸ”΅ 6.0 – 6.9: Decent

6.0–6.4 β†’ Competent but flawed; worth a read if you like the premise.

6.5–6.9 β†’ Solid; enjoyable, though not remarkable.


🟣 7.0 – 7.9: Good

7.0–7.4 β†’ Definitely enjoyable; good art or characters, minor flaws.

7.5–7.9 β†’ Strongly good; memorable characters, arcs you’d recommend, above the pack.


🌟 8.0 – 8.9: Very Good

8.0–8.4 β†’ Consistently enjoyable with strong highlights.

8.5–8.9 β†’ Excellent; near β€œmust read” territory, only small issues keep it from masterpiece status.


πŸ† 9.0 – 9.9: Outstanding

9.0–9.4 β†’ Almost flawless, highly polished, widely recommendable.

9.5–9.9 β†’ Genre-defining, peak storytelling/art; sticks with you for years.


πŸ’Ž 10.0: Masterpiece

10.0 β†’ A perfect work for what it sets out to do. Timeless, endlessly re-readable, nearly impossible to improve.


βš–οΈ How to Interpret the Decimal

The integer (whole number) = the tier (e.g., 7 = good, 8 = very good).

The decimal (x.0 β†’ x.9) = the strength within that tier.

x.0–x.2 = Low end of the tier. Barely qualifies.

x.3–x.6 = Solidly within the tier. Representative.

x.7–x.9 = High end of the tier. Almost reaching the next category.

Example:

7.0 = just qualifies as β€œgood.”

7.4 = securely good.

7.8 = almost β€œvery good.”

8.9 = near-masterpiece, but not quite. __

"With this in mind, have you guys read anything worth 9+?"


... Last edited by The_Venerable 2 months ago
________________

β€œA river does not boast of its depth; yet one step too far, and it swallows kings.”

You must be registered to post!
Β