| From User |
Message Body |
|
Robokitty
|
Post #385116 |
Member
3:05 am, Jun 13 2010
Posts: 10
|
whats do u prefer first person shooter or third person shooter. First Person: COD4/ Third Person: MGS4....what do u guys prefer...yea -__-
|
|
MaKinima
|
Post #385118 |
Member
3:11 am, Jun 13 2010
Posts: 13
|
I like both but I would prefer third persons because you can do so much more with it. Things like a cover system (Gears of War) and hand-to-hand combat (MGS) look much better in third person. While it may also be possible (and more interesting) to do the same to first-person shooters, no one pursues it so the gameplay gets linear in my opinion...
|
|
greydrak
|
Post #385486 |
Member
7:41 pm, Jun 14 2010
Posts: 640
|
FPS makes me dizzy...I'm not playing the necessary hours it'll take for my brain/body to adjust to the view point while feeling like crap for a game.
Third Person are way more interesting to look at and play, I could care less about such "realism" in games like these.
________________
  |
|
loosecannon504
|
Post #385493 |
The Gorilla Killa™
Member
8:13 pm, Jun 14 2010
Posts: 3228
|
I like both, but I'm getting more into third person shooters lately. The best kind though are ones that offer both, like Fallout 3 and Unreal Tournament 3/Unreal Championship 2004.
________________
Quote from Klapzi The cool part is that I never get tired of being deceived
Quote from tactics Just because someone's head was chopped off doesn't mean they're dead. That's just silly.
 |
|
Domonkazu
|
Post #386166 |
 Member
7:32 pm, Jun 17 2010
Posts: 969
|
fps for me, 3rd person view killed my accuracy 
________________
"we are people because of other people"
"I am who I am because of who we all are" |
|
Dragonfiremule
|
Post #386171 |
A Person
Member
7:53 pm, Jun 17 2010
Posts: 2098
|
I get frustrated by the more limited view in FPS, so I prefer third person.
________________
Quote Does the walker choose the path, or the path the walker? |
|
Hellsayer
|
Post #386173 |
Godslayer
Member
8:02 pm, Jun 17 2010
Posts: 188
|
first person is easier to aim in and is easier to fight without cover in but third person lets you observe your surroundings without having to turn your character around and you can fight behind cover more easily. i like them both equally. 
________________
[m]http://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=1332[/m]
Scanlators Needed
"Officially, this machine doesn't exist, you didn't get it from me, and I don't know you. Make sure it doesn't leave the building." Graphing Calculator Story
Gods Must Be Strong,
Godslayers Must be Stronger |
|
joshflip1989
|
Post #386174 |
GAM
Member
8:03 pm, Jun 17 2010
Posts: 114
|
I like both
________________
The Bird of Hermes is my name, eating my wings to make me tame. |
|
flapple
|
Post #388422 |
Member
7:46 am, Jun 27 2010
Posts: 68
|
Doesnt matter really. Intense shooter I like to be first person, but those casual shooters and stealth shooting i would like to be third person.
________________
Whats a Flapple? |
|
GreenTeaStrawberry
|
Post #393157 |
Over the Rainbow.
Member
8:38 pm, Jul 21 2010
Posts: 664
|
Surprised there are so many votes for third person. FPS all the way. Modern Warfare, Doom, Far Cry, Halo, Goldeneye, etc. How can any tps beat that? Gears of War is great and all but nothing can get you hooked like a great fps. 
________________
Lots and lots of blood! |
|
sandman1008
|
Post #394088 |
Member
2:10 am, Jul 25 2010
Posts: 316
|
TPS for me. Never been a fan of FPS. Games like MGS4 (I don't know if I consider this a TPS, but it has TPS qualities), Uncharted 2, Resident Evil 5, and Red Dead Redemption (again, TPS qualities) are much more enjoyable for me than repetitive FPS. TPS tends to offer more versatility, and they tend to focus a lot more on other aspects of games (such as story) than FPS. FPS seem to focus primarily on online multi-player. While it can be addicting, I want my games to be more than just an online multi-player.
|
|
oak
|
Post #396334 |
Manga Researcher
Member
4:31 am, Aug 2 2010
Posts: 60
|
I feel it completely depends on the game. I don't have a preference as long as it works with the game concept/design. Most TPS games wouldn't work as well using FPS and vice versa and I like games that use either of the systems. Gears, CoD, MGS, Unreal Tournament 3, Team Fortress 2...issaaaalllgood!
|
|
oneluminousfish
|
Post #396335 |
nomnomnom
Member
4:37 am, Aug 2 2010
Posts: 131
|
I go with either. But yea it depends on the game and console. For example, I'm good at Halo but stink at CS for fps
________________
"ありがとう...だ いすき...DAISY" ♥ |
|
x0mbiec0rp
|
Post #396454 - Reply to ( #393157) by GreenTeaStrawberry |
lagomorphilia!
Member
11:09 pm, Aug 2 2010
Posts: 2498
|
Quote from GreenTeaStrawberry Surprised there are so many votes for third person. FPS all the way. Modern Warfare, Doom, Far Cry, Halo, Goldeneye, etc. How can any tps beat that? Gears of War is great and all but nothing can get you hooked like a great fps.
Your very quote shows me how third person shooters can beat those. I didn't think any of those were particularly memorable (except Goldeneye), nor did any (except Goldeneye) really get me hooked. It's very subjective.
I prefer the context sensitive actions and superior stealth and cover options third person shooters give, so I'd go tps instead.
________________
This signature was recovered from Hades to serve in my rotting armies. |
|
imnotamused
|
Post #396458 |
Member
11:44 pm, Aug 2 2010
Posts: 16
|
resident evil is a great example of tps
counter-strike is a great example of a fps
I like tps for story, and fps for action
also Killer7
|
