Is peace EVEN possible?
15 years ago
Posts: 774
Quote from Sagaris
Ugh, I officially join the "MU forum is an ass place" club....Freaking tree hugging hippies.....
LOL This made me smile.
I get what you're saying, but sharing just isn't gonna happen.
This isn't the book "The Giver". Plus even if we did share resources what then?
Then everyone lives longer? The planet will blow up.
India and China are already pushing the limits and making Tuvalu shit bricks cause it's underwater. The earth can't make enough resources for everyone... especially if everyone had a medium lifestyle.
Does that make sense? I know what I want to say but I'm not sure if it came out right.
15 years ago
Posts: 1668
Warn: Banned
Quote from Kitteh_13
Quote from BoxBox
Ugh, I officially join the "MU forum is an ass place" club....Freaking tree hugging hippies.....
LOL This made me smile.
I get what you're saying, but sharing just isn't gonna happen.
This isn't the book "The Giver". Plus even if we did share resources what then?
Then everyone lives longer? The planet will blow up.
India and China are already pushing the limits and making Tuvalu shit bricks cause it's underwater. The earth can't make enough resources for everyone... especially if everyone had a medium lifestyle.Does that make sense? I know what I want to say but I'm not sure if it came out right.
HOLY MOTHER F&%^% CRAP!! That was my point. Major Face Palm.....I think you were a pervert on Chat Roulette for too long, it's affecting your visions....
Quote from BoxBox
That's just BullSh*t, we don't have peace because we don't have enough resources for everyone. Even if everyone gives some of their belonging to their poorer neighbors, everyone just becomes poorer. The only true answer is technology, when we have invented something[like matter energy transforming machine that makes food out of sunlight] that will solve our need for resources
Quote from you_no_see_me_
this is not about cannibalism...please get back on topic
Quote from Toto
I think it is exactly the topic. I see nothing wrong.
15 years ago
Posts: 774
Quote from BoxBox
Quote from Kitteh_13
Quote from BoxBox
Ugh, I officially join the "MU forum is an ass place" club....Freaking tree hugging hippies.....
LOL This made me smile.
I get what you're saying, but sharing just isn't gonna happen.
This isn't the book "The Giver". Plus even if we did share resources what then?
Then everyone lives longer? The planet will blow up.
India and China are already pushing the limits and making Tuvalu shit bricks cause it's underwater. The earth can't make enough resources for everyone... especially if everyone had a medium lifestyle.Does that make sense? I know what I want to say but I'm not sure if it came out right.
HOLY MOTHER F&%^% CRAP!! That was my point. Major Face Palm.....I think you were a pervert on Chat Roulette for too long, it's affecting your visions....
Quote from BoxBox
That's just BullSh*t, we don't have peace because we don't have enough resources for everyone. Even if everyone gives some of their belonging to their poorer neighbors, [u]everyone just becomes poorer.[/u] The only true answer is technology, when we have invented something[like matter energy transforming machine that makes food out of sunlight] that will solve our need for resources
LOL You're posts are too long to read all of them.
Yeah but even if we did make something to "create" resources I'm sure it would be expensive and monopolized therefor solving nothing. We haven't even cured cancer yet.
Hey hey hey. I've never been on chat roulette yet.
15 years ago
Posts: 3120
Kitteh, I did not say that. You quoted the wrong person.
15 years ago
Posts: 774
😮 My bad.
I think it's cause there can be so many quotes in one post. I'll fix it.
Member15 years ago
Posts: 1966
Quote from Kitteh_13
Quote from Sagaris
Ugh, I officially join the "MU forum is an ass place" club....Freaking tree hugging hippies.....
LOL This made me smile.
You quoted the wrong person. Just came here to point that out since it didn't sound like something Sagaga would post. You made me backtrack here, I was actually going to laugh at him for this statement. I'm disappointed. =/
Edit~ Booh, he got to it himself. Damn you! D=<
Won't bother to answer the topic question in such great lengths as some of you did here...so my answer is just a "no".
This thread should die. Let that be the first step towards "peace". Second would be to get rid of all the trolls here.
[img]http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lq2hczRc5d1r1rvcno1_500.gif[/img]
Monkeys, always at your service.
Quote from NightSwan
I have to thank you again. It's been a while since I've had this much d**k on my computer. :'3
15 years ago
Posts: 742
please stick to the topic. thanks.
read my post on page 5 it clearly states what peace is.
15 years ago
Posts: 452
peace is possible, but it will most likely never happen while humans exist... like if we turn into robots or something yeah peace will without a doubt be quite possible.
for the moment, no way.
Quote from Kitteh_13
India and China are already pushing the limits and making Tuvalu shit bricks cause it's underwater. The earth can't make enough resources for everyone... especially if everyone had a medium lifestyle.
uuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhh.... doesnt usa consume many times more resources per person?...
we win in arrogance and ability to destroy our planet, but with less people.
15 years ago
Posts: 15
Nope, everyone has a different definition of peace. One person's definition would be: polygramy and loli for all. Another could be: no polygramy and no loli. As long as their's differences, there won't be peace. For complete peace = have to remove/erase opinions, social groups, money, politics, , and etc... 😮 🙄
15 years ago
Posts: 603
Quote from Phantasia
Nope, everyone has a different definition of peace. One person's definition would be: polygramy and loli for all. Another could be: no polygramy and no loli. As long as their's differences, there won't be peace. For complete peace = have to remove/erase opinions, social groups, money, politics, , and etc... 😮 🙄
Ok sure everyone has there own definition of peace in their own right, but alot of these definitions collide making what? Conflict? This then becomes none peacefull.
Like what westsiders has said, "a drug dealers peace could be the absence of cops and a police's peace could be the capture of the drug dealers". (conflict)
What this means is that we need to capitalise on a universal peace. If every one was to have their own peace as a whole no one would have peace. So in the end there is no real peace just an illusion of something that can not be fully archived unless we become mindless, opinionless and oppressed people who have the same views...
[img]http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k528/fr33noob/on3winged9.jpg[/img]
I believe in letting people do as they wish, as do I myself. Sometimes, of course, what I wish to do is kill them and they do not wish to die. This gives life interest.
[img]http://www.nodiatis.com/pub/26.jpg[/img]
Moderator15 years ago
Posts: 9026
Okay, we filled our monthly quota of discussion.
/locked.
source: animenewsnetwork
Join SRoMU Scanlations or visit #SRoMU at IRCHighWay.
