New Poll - Dere
8 years ago
Posts: 42
Quote from zarlan
Based on what?
I can get arguing that there would be a difference, but... what reason do you have for that?
I don't see any.[url=http://https://bangin.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/クーデレcoo-dere/]Coodere link[/url]
The above de ...First of all:
The forums auto-correction of URLs, tends to screw up addresses, by correcting that which is actually already correct. (it mainly ...
Way to go.
coo-dere= cool(english word, then abbreviated) + dere(japanese word "tereru"). Meanwhile kuudere= kuu(japanese word, either it refers to "a noun" form or "a verb-transitive" form, also both form have totally different kanji and meaning, please check your proud japanese<->english dictionary.) + dere(japanese word "tereru")
i hope that does not explain anything.
XP
8 years ago
Posts: 9
Quote from fridge
this poll is stupid
I am not trying to be mean or anything, but you didn't have to vote/comment on it.
8 years ago
Posts: 9
Quote from zarlan
No, not people. Just you. I don't see anyone else making a big deal out of it, or getting emotional about it.
I mean they are taking the poll a little too seriously.
Some people are calling it " stupid " ( which is fine, but it might hurt the creator's feelings ) and others are calling the creator a " shenanigan ".
8 years ago
Posts: 9
Quote from mikako17
Your link doesn't seem to differentiate between kuudere or coodere; the definition doesn't make it different to kuudere since the definition of kuudere, at least on tv tropes, is basically that one. It doesn't help that an alternate, and the usual romaji, spelling of クー is kuu.
Can you explain wh ...
Okay, I found another link that works....
Kuudere
An anime/manga slang term for a character that is cold, blunt, cynical, and pretty much doesn't care if her beloved dies. That's what she is on the outside but she is actually caring and nice on the inside.
Differs from tsundere since tsundere is when the character frequently runs hot and cold between tsun and dere. Kuudere is when the character only occasionally shows her caring side.
Occasionally this is a trait of the true Emotionless Girl, added deliberately by writers or projected by fans.
Compared to yandere and tsundere, the kuudere has a higher chance of being either gender.
Coodere
If she is usually so cold to you and sometimes becomes so nice(sweet?) such as Suzumiya Haruhi, she would be labelled as ツンデレ. But what if she is so cool rather than cold? And what if such an emotionless girl fawns upon you when she bursts into tears? Yes, she would be a type of クーデレ. クー[coo] derives from cool, and デレ[dere] stems from デレデレ[dere dere] which has a nuance of being so sweet. Speaking of クーデレ girls, I can think of Rei Ayanami[Evangelion], Yuina Himoo[Toki meki memorial], or Mai Kawasumi. If you look at any bishoujo anime carefully, you might find this type of girl.
I think they sound different enough.....
link
8 years ago
Posts: 461
Quote from LilyLoveBloop
I mean they are taking the poll a little too seriously.
I see no one doing that.
Some people are calling it " stupid "
That does not indicate that the person is taking it seriously, or all that strongly.
Also, it was not some people.
"People" is plural.
You can't say "people", about one person. That is completely wrong and misleading.
It was one single person ...and that was after I had made my comment (it was posted just before it, but after I had written mine).
( which is fine, but it might hurt the creator's feelings )
...if the creator is very thin-skinned/insecure, and not really suited to being on an internet forum (if you can't take mild criticism, why are you in a place where you are guaranteed to receive far worse? Even in the most civil/polite places on the internet).
and others are calling the creator a " shenanigan ".
No, most certainly not.
A shenanigan is a trick or a bit of mischief.
A person can perform shenanigans, but not be one.
The post was expressing the strong suspicion that the creator was playing a trick on us.
And again: it was one single person!
"Others" is plural, and thus completely wrong and misleading.
You know full well that it was one person, in both of these cases, but chose to use what are obviously plural forms.
Frankly, I'm starting to suspect shenanigans, myself... (I like to keep to Hanlon's Razor, but... there are limits.)
Okay, I found another link that works....
...except it doesn't
Not only is it one of the pages I've already encountered, when I tried to find out what coodere meant, but...
The explanation for coodere, is the EXACT SAME one, copy pasted in there.
How could you expect the same exact text on a different page, to be any better evidence (or count as a different source of evidence, at all) than the first page you linked to?
Did you not notice that it was the exact same text, in every regard (ever letter, bit of punctuation, parentheses and everything)?
Edit:
Seeing that you'd just made 9 posts, and thinking that surely you've made about that many here, I got a bit suspicious...
I see that you made your account very recently.
A moments before making your first post in this thread, in fact, where you complain about non-existent bashing of the creator of this poll (the focus of almost all your posts), in fact
...and all your comments, are the ones in this poll
Except for a "I'm new here" post, ten minutes before that and given that those ten minutes includes the time it took to write the first post you made here (and there was some length to it), you clearly went straight to making it, right after the "I'm new here" post.
...
I'm beginning to suspect shenanigans, all the more strongly... Very strongly, in fact.
8 years ago
Posts: 3
Quote from zarlan
Quote from LilyLoveBloop
I mean they are taking the poll a little too seriously.
I see no one doing that.
Some people are calling it " stupid "
That does not indicate that the person is taking it seriously, or all that strongly.
Also, it was not some people.
"People" is plural.
You can't say "people", about one person. That is completely wrong and misleading.
It was one single person ...and that was after I had made my comment (it was posted just before it, but after I had written mine).( which is fine, but it might hurt the creator's feelings )
...if the creator is very thin-skinned/insecure, and not really suited to being on an internet forum (if you can't take mild criticism, why are you in a place where you are guaranteed to receive far worse? Even in the most civil/polite places on the internet).
and others are calling the creator a " shenanigan ".
No, most certainly not.
A shenanigan is a trick or a bit of mischief.
A person can perform shenanigans, but not be one.
The post was expressing the strong suspicion that the creator was playing a trick on us.And again: it was one single person!
"Others" is plural, and thus completely wrong and misleading.
You know full well that it was one person, in both of these cases, but chose to use what are obviously plural forms.
Frankly, I'm starting to suspect shenanigans, myself... (I like to keep to Hanlon's Razor, but... there are limits.)Okay, I found another link that works....
...except it doesn't
Not only is it one of the pages I've already encountered, when I tried to find out what coodere meant, but...The explanation for coodere, is the EXACT SAME one, copy pasted in there.
How could you expect the same exact text on a different page, to be any better evidence (or count as a different source of evidence, at all) than the first page you linked to?
Did you not notice that it was the exact same text, in every regard (ever letter, bit of punctuation, parentheses and everything)?Edit:
Seeing that you'd just made 9 posts, and thinking that surely you've made about that many here, I got a bit suspicious...
I see that you made your account very recently.
A moments before making your first post in this thread, in fact, where you complain about non-existent bashing of the creator of this poll (the focus of almost all your posts), in fact
...and all your comments, are the ones in this poll
Except for a "I'm new here" post, ten minutes before that and given that those ten minutes includes the time it took to write the first post you made here (and there was some length to it), you clearly went straight to making it, right after the "I'm new here" post.
...
I'm beginning to suspect shenanigans, all the more strongly... Very strongly, in fact.
Writing a huge text even though you know that no one will read because no one cares about your opinion is the definition of taking it too serious. Just chill in your corner.
8 years ago
Posts: 461
Quote from dragon4254
Writing a huge text even though you know that no one will read
Bullshit.
Also, why waste space, by including the whole thing in a quote, when you're not referring to any of it?
That is the definition of spamming.
because no one cares about your opinion
You are not everyone. Keep your arrogance in check.
is the definition of taking it too serious.
How so? My comment was long, because I had much to reply to.
...and it started to look like something to take seriously (as I mentioned), quite frankly.

8 years ago
Posts: 402
I wanted to see ヘルノーデレ in the options.

8 years ago
Posts: 4764
No dere for me, thanks.
I don't like extreme personality flips.
Hrodulf and Bjornolfr, you will not be forgotten.
[img]http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp199/SyberAngelGabrielle/couplesig.jpg[/img]
[color=black]And if the world were black and white,
you would be my rainbow in shades of grey.[/color]
If I had a fantasy self, it'd be a tentacle monster.
8 years ago
Posts: 15
or death, it depends on the yandere
8 years ago
Posts: 12
i know a few but still were waiting for that option or "i can't care less"haha