MU Fun facts (aka the geek topic)

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
Okay so some of us geeks like checking the history of things and statistics so I noticed something interesting :
The Ten Oldest Active (forum) members are:
(Form oldest to newest)
Name - Join Date - R - G - S - P
Manick (The Creator)- 2004-07-16 4pm - 4903 - 77 - 857 - 976
Hostile (Admin) - 2005-04-29 12pm- 760- 49 - 259 - 283
mellowmut(Admin) - 2005-06-16 5pm - 1367 - 118 - 236 - 211
Kraust (member) - 2005-06-19 7am - 18 - 3 - 31 - 17
Isabel (member) - 2005-06-27 3pm - 0 - 0 - 0 - 16
Kaioh (moderator) - 2005-08-08 2am - 4 - 4 - 3 - 166
Aerus (member) - 2005-09-29 5pm - 0 - 0 - 0 - 74
lambchopsil (Adm.) - 2005-11-11 4pm - 6931 - 95 - 638 - 740
GGpX (member) - 2006-04-18 1pm - 42 - 0 - 8 - 77
Madocchi (memb.)- 2006-04-25 11am- 59 - 1 - 1 - 31
Key:
R=releases added
G=groups added
S=Series added
P=posts(duh)
Criterion:
15+ posts
Last post within 30 days
Shockers: Aerus is that old to these forums ? Kraust did you die and ressurct two years later lol? Maddochi's last post was 24 days ago so barely made it 🙂
Honorable mentions:
AstroNerdBoy - 2006-01-27 11pm - 0 - 0 - 0 - 21
Didn't make it last post was 36 days ago otherwise he's number 8
No 11:
aymie - 2006-06-18 6pm - 4 - 1 - 5 - 16
If i'm the only one that finds this stuff interesting then fine if not post any stuff like this here anything at all like total posts 🙂 I'm no.3..... for now

18 years ago
Posts: 1117
LoooL i did check those out before, but your shockers did shock me, Kraust was that old! not to mention Aerus....this forum isn't old but for some reason i feel like it's always been there 😲

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
Also the people currently on the 1022nd page in the members list in ascending order in terms of posts are:
lilchoconut -2006-10-27 1pm- 2- 0 -5 -247
daed -2007-01-17 11pm- 0- 0 -0 -247
Gediminas -2006-11-11 7am- 0 -0 -0 -253
Hostile- 2005-04-29 12pm -760- 49 -259 -283
SirGir- 2006-12-14 3pm -1- 0- 0 -294
chueisha- 2007-03-24 10am- 0- 1- 1 -432
bully_jesus- 2006-11-05 12pm- 0 -0- 0 -438
Stealth -2006-11-25 3pm- 1- 0 -0- 479
lambchopsil- 2005-11-11 4pm -6931- 95 -638- 740
luisalirio84- 2007-04-01 9pm- 4 -1- 0 -842
ares6 -2006-11-19 6pm- 0- 0 -0 -884
Manick- 2004-07-16 4pm- 4903- 77 -857- 976
In terms of posts per day I rule them all mwahaha Just divide their post count by the number of days ago they joined and you'll see the ratio is one sided in my favour mwahahahaha and it'll get even worse in the weeks to come. Mwahahahah 😛
@Manick there should be a numer of topics started statistic so we can know who has no creativity at all 🤣 If you like i'll make it an official suggestion 😕 😎

18 years ago
Posts: 563
Whee! Geekery!
What's the importance of the 1022nd page?

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
Hmm when you sort by post for some reason you can't sort in descending order so the least posts are on page 1 and the most posts on page 1022
also 1022x25= 25550 members wait that's wierd 😕 WTF? 🤨 🙄 Something is wrong there o_0

18 years ago
Posts: 563
Quote from luisalirio84
Hmm when you sort by post for some reason you can't sort in descending order so the least posts are on page 1 and the most posts on page 1022
also 1022x25= 25550 members wait that's wierd 😕 WTF? 🤨 🙄 Something is wrong there o_0
How many people have 2 posts or less? My guess: 25500 😀 😢

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
No no there are only about 25550 members according to the members list and the forums page says 31000+ . This geek topic may turn out to be a system flaw/redundancies checker. Manick or some admin can you explain why there are only 25550 members on the members list? 😳
Also Gir you are close the number of members with two posts or less is 25,016. Meaning according to the members list only 522 members have 3 or more posts that translates to 2.087% of all members having more than 2 posts and 97.013% with less than 3 posts. Scary stuff. Which means that from every 47.484 members only 1 will have more than 2 posts. hehe
18 years ago
Posts: 0
Quote from luisalirio84
Hmm when you sort by post for some reason you can't sort in descending order so the least posts are on page 1 and the most posts on page 1022
also 1022x25= 25550 members wait that's wierd 😕 WTF? 🤨 🙄 Something is wrong there o_0
You know that you can change the sorting order by clicking again on the link (post to sort by post) and the click again to change the orer... well I'm not sure you get what I mean... anyway there is also that small triangle, by clicking on it you change the order to...
(well I have a hard time explaining this stuff... but what I mean is look harder there is that option)

18 years ago
Posts: 2896
Warn: Banned
Quote from luisalirio84
No no there are only about 25550 members according to the members list and the forums page says 31000+ . This geek topic may turn out to be a system flaw/redundancies checker. Manick or some admin can you explain why there are only 25550 members on the members list? 😳
Also Gir you are close the number of members with two posts or less is 25,016. Meaning according to the members list only 522 members have 3 or more posts that translates to 2.087% of all members having more than 2 posts and 97.013% with less than 3 posts. Scary stuff. Which means that from every 47.484 members only 1 will have more than 2 posts. hehe
........You people have wayyyy too much time........
Can't you see it's a conspiracy?
[color=green]Life, what would it be without so much wrongs and rights?
[/color]
[color=red]Star Trek XI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZiR-NETDr0[/color]

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
wtf ares 6?
I thought we were'nt ever gonna see you again?
Are you here cause you don't wanna lose you second place in post count?
Who cares are you back for good or just stopping by?
And you know this is exactly the kind of topic you would post in btw 😀
@Stalth yeah the arrow works thanks. But that doesn't change anything I said about the number of members not matching.
Ares6 again what are you doing here? Did you sort out your problems?

18 years ago
Posts: 2896
Warn: Banned
yeah.....I sorted out my problems.....what problems are those again?
Does this topic contribute nothing but mindless info and spamming purposes?
ehh...forget it, I'm too lazy to log on.
[color=green]Life, what would it be without so much wrongs and rights?
[/color]
[color=red]Star Trek XI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZiR-NETDr0[/color]

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
Actually short answer is no. Long answer would be too difficult for you to comprehend not even the fastest super computer would understand.
Too lazy to log on? Geez I never could guess what your problems could be you left so suddenly. Anyways fun fact no 4 : Lambchopsil has the most Added releases I think.
Edit: Yes sir Sargent Stealth Sir.lol Sorry It was only cause I was surprised. Back on topic anyone else wanna add some stats?
Oh and stealth that thing about there being a bug in the number of members ? Know anything about it? 😎
18 years ago
Posts: 0
Quote from ares6
yeah.....I sorted out my problems.....what problems are those again?
Does this topic contribute nothing but mindless info and spamming purposes?
There is no rule against making useless threads in the chaterbox... (well there is a limit to everything, but this is still within my boundary of acceptability, could be different for the other mods)
But I what I do not like is bringing private conversations in an already borderline thread... And what's worse is spamming even more threads... (you know what I mean luisalirio84)
So keep this on topic. you can chat by PM all you want though.
(and welcome back ares6)

18 years ago
Posts: 10892
Hmm, ares6 is back, at least for now.
As for the statistics, try to realize that the first forum post was August 16, 2006 (but you guys wouldn't know that since only admins can see that first post...), while the site was first started a little more than 2 years before that (around July 16, 2004). That means a lot of people joined BEFORE the forum was even started. Although, we DID start adding a ton of member-only features to the site a little before adding the forums, so technically speaking, the major influx of people registering occurred just before the forum was implemented. BUT, if you were here when the forum started, then you would know that not many people registered for the forum or used it. People registered for the other features like the filtering, highlighting, and so forth.
As for the difference in the number of members, I don't know for sure, but I believe some members were deleted in some way...or maybe they never confirmed their registration. Manick can probably answer when he gets back from whatever he's doing. (I believe it's Wed he's back?...)
So, you like that really high number of releases I've added? Did you also know that if you click the # on the member page, then you can see exactly which releases I added?
http://www.mangaupdates.com/members.html?orderby=added_releases&asc=desc
(Just if you really wanna check what I've done for the site~)
A just ruler amongst tyrants

18 years ago
Posts: 1199
Cool thanks lambchop you answered a lot of questions I wanted to ask not to mention the great history lesson and yep you have done a lot for this site there would be 6000+ less releases 😀 Also cool I can see what type of series you like to add(but I knew that just never used it). Geez my head is spinning today 🙁 🙄