Quote from fr33noob

Well if you look at his post it constantly mentions things about evolution> isn't that phillosofical?

I'm sorry but I have to laugh at you 🤣

This week's favorites:

• Golden Kamui

ççççççç[Ô.Ô] tsutopodus© will eat your manga and steal your cats!

Quote from fr33noob

Well if you look at his post it constantly mentions things about evolution> isn't that phillosofical?

philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom... he was just saying gay men are gross and gay women are totally badass, and making us have a pointless conversation with eachother. i think...

Quote from wotonito

philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom... he was just saying gay men are gross and gay women are totally badass, and making us have a pointless conversation with eachother. i think...

And if this is truly the case, we already have a thread for that. 🙂

Quote from Raeryn

Quote from wotonito

philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom... he was just saying gay men are gross and gay women are totally badass, and making us have a pointless conversation with eachother. i think...

And if this is truly the case, we already have a thread for that. 🙂

yeah... thats why i dont really understand the point of this thread, i think itll be locked pretty soon.

Quote from wotonito

Quote from fr33noob

Well if you look at his post it constantly mentions things about evolution> isn't that phillosofical?

philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom... he was just saying gay men are gross and gay women are totally badass, and making us have a pointless conversation with eachother. i think...

Definition: Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, truth, beauty, law, justice, validity, mind, and language...

yeah... thats why i dont really understand the point of this thread, i think itll be locked pretty soon.

Yeah, I can see this being locked as well rofl.

Your from the order? I've never seen you before.
[img]http://i654.photobucket.com/albums/uu270/Snowman3000/sig8.jpg[/img]

Quote from x50 50x

I have seen your post history, you don't get to say anything I say is ridiculous

Oh, where to begin?..
Let me first state that I disagree, but I think that much should be obvious.

Quote from angelh3art

I am asking every participant to this argument to stand and take a point of view, NOT a male point of view, NEITHER a female point of view. A point of view of a spectator regardless of your gender or sexuality. (What this means is that you should have a look at this whole concept from a factual and moral perspective at the same time, and take your time to discuss your thoughts on this topic.)

I'll be as objective as I can be.

Reason 1: Visual appearance

Guy-on-guy action is very sick and twisted. Firstly I shall state my reasons for why I believe that girl-on-girl action is innocent and why a guy-on-guy action is just purely sick and twisted. When 2 girls are kissing, it's the same as 2 guys kissing, this is innocent. Both ways. When a girl is rubbing another girl's breasts, or a guy kissing another man's chest, this is still - innocent. When a girl is pleasuring her partner with a strap-on, it is innocent, since strap-on is a piece of plastic nothing else, much like a tool, used in a right place at a right time. When a guy shoves his erect penis into another man's anus, and pulls it out after a hardcore sex scene with shit dripping off. I'm sorry but in this case, not only that anal sex is disguisting, for a man to do it with another man is in no way innocent.

The vagina is typically cleaned by the female in possession of it. Well males can do the same for their anus, as most do. It's really the only sanitary way to do it. So there is a way to make it not ' sick and twisted'. Also it should be state that the vagina must be cleaned for sanitary reason as well.
I also feel it should be pointed out that what is 'sick and twisted', or 'disgusting' is purely subjective. For example: you find homosexual male sex to be disgusting, I find it quite the opposite, to be very nice.

Reason 2: Technicalities in depth

During a heterosexual sex act, a man is the pivot point. It depends on him how fast a girl will ejaculate, it depends on him when to ejaculate himself(in some cases in a girl's mouth or on her body). Overall this makes the man of what's known as "provider", who's counterpart is the "receiver", the woman. This way it is balanced out and thus is called "heterosexual" (hetero (greek. lang. element for -- Other; Different).
When a homosexual act takes place with either: 2 men or 2 women, this means they are the same sex, however, when 2 women do it there is no "provider" in the act, thus making it innocent pleasures achieved with hand movement or artificial tools. When 2 men do it, there are 2 natural "providers" exchanging their genetical components directly, either into eachother's mouth or anus. This makes it just sick to think about in the first place.

Yet again, it's all subjective. Please tell me how that makes it sick? I can't fathom why it makes it sick... Please be specific.

Reason 3: Morals & Beliefs

Females(as a being and a part of humans) are a symbol of beauty, physical fragility versus males, and moral dependance in some cases(is why a wife needs her husband to raise the kids, financial support etc.)
Males(as a being and a part of humans) are a symbol of physical capability(strength), moral support, and are able to provide moral and physical security for their chosen Females.

When 2 women are doing it, they are both the symbol of beauty, making it double, fragility (making it delicate and passionate), moral dependance(meaning they can understand eachother's desires better than anyone thus attempting to provide the security for eachother, which is by the way just cute).

When 2 men are doing it, the sweaty muscly bodies which are supposed to be providing the females, are corrupt and twisted, with no moral support required, both of these men require no physical or moral security in that sense (excluding abuse which rarely happens in civilised countries with all the gay pride parades available for their comfort) 2 gay men are not as scared to go out in public as much as 2 lesbians are, who fear to be abused by people. Fact.

You are relying on gender here, and gender roles are subjective, non-static, and vary from society to society. Thus it's not a good reference point because you are over generalizing males and females.

Males can have just as emotionally fulfilling relationships as females can. You are relying on stereotype that state that males are emotionless sex machines, and you are ignoring the implications such a statement has for heterosexual sex.

And explain to me how it's corrupt?

Reason 4: Creating intentional & innocent evolutionary disadvantages

Men, who were originally born as providers for extending the future generations, thus providing an extension to our evolutionary chain, are technically breaking the code of evolution providing their genes to a non-fertile channel, while making love to eachother.
There is a reason why a man should provide it's genetical contents to a females ovaries for a baby to be able to form through a connection of both of their genes.
But when two men are making love, the sharing of the genes is intentional. Both ways. (And I do not mean intentional in a way where they think about it, it is physically intentional if you will).

Women, who were originally born as receivers (genetically), for extending the future generations, thus(also) providing an extension to our evolutionary chain, are NOT breaking the code of evolution. Now you have to pay attention to this part very carefully because it gets tricky.
By saying that lesbians do Not break the code of evolution I'm not saying that gays should be neglected and lesbians promoted. No. Because when two lesbians are making love, they also, much like the gays have no chance of having a baby with no provider. HOWEVER, when lesbians are making love, they do not provide any genetical information to a non-fertile channel. Since you can't insert a vagina inside a vagina(obviously). THIS is what makes lesbian love innocent. and (in my opinion) cute.

I feel it's important to point out that homosexuality, in humans and other animals, has been around for a very long time. Bear that in mind when I inform you that we are still around. If we were a real threat to the human species, then we would have died off already. Going beyond that, we don't need to breed right now. We have over populated the earth as it is.

" they do not provide any genetical information to a non-fertile channel."
Yes, but no genetic material is going to get anywhere where it can help make a baby! I see no difference where the fluids end up. If it's different, then explain why it makes a difference.

"The end bit":
This thread took me above an hour to make and, really, moderators? please do have some sense of maturity to let people discuss this thread and not just remove it because I have wondered this for a long time and I do need some feedback about how people think, on top of this I tried as hard as I could to make this as informative as possible.

PEOPLE!:
I adress all of you who have read this thread, Please do not be offended, this is just my mere thoughts based on factual information, I do not intend to make enemies on the forum, I am simply a very curious and philosophical person. Be free to post anything that's on your mind, and please, to prevent the spam on this thread, only reply if you have some common sense in you, remember THINK! don't let the emotions overtake you, because that way you will just make yourselves look stupid. 😉
Enjoy posting.

How can I not be offended? You spent an hour typing up a post to explain why I am disgusting. If you think that any homosexual is going to read this, and not be offended? Then you good sir are dreadfully mistaken.

Closing statement...ish thing...
You rely on subjective things through out the entire post. Give us something that is not subjective and that you can prove.

It's really late, and I'm tired... I apologize for any errors in my post... And to be honest, I am hoping this is satire... I really hope it is...

You seem to have your discrimination skills down pat 😉

"Reason" 1: It seems that mainly you have a problem with anal sex. Besides, not all gay men have anal sex! But, plenty of heterosexual people do. And I'm sure a lesbian would have no problem moving that strap-on just a little lower.

"Reason" 2: 😕 Condoms, anyone?

"Reason" 3: "2 gay men are not as scared to go out in public as much as 2 lesbians are, who fear to be abused by people. Fact." Fact? There are no facts ITT.

"Reason" 4: Really? 🤨 Because birth control, abortion, abstinence, and sterilization weren't already breaking the code of evolution.

I might of taken you a bit more seriously if you weren't so biased and refrained from using words such as "disgusting," "sick," and "cute." And actually brought some "factual information" to the table instead of your warped opinion.

[img]http://i.imgur.com/B400485.jpg[/img]

Quote from wotonito

yeah... thats why i dont really understand the point of this thread, i think itll be locked pretty soon.

Locked~

Would've already locked it at first post if I wasn't asleep. 🤣