A not-so-popular manga that you love?
12 years ago
Posts: 187
You probably have a manga or two that you just love that aren't too known. What's their title? (one shots count!)
12 years ago
Posts: 383
Suoai metaphysica one-shot
Kemono Kingdom - Zoo
I'm considering to put 7 Seeds in the list, but I think 7 Seeds is popular enough.
12 years ago
Posts: 525
Ginen Shounen - love it cause I'm a childhood friends fanatic
Tokage Ouji - cute fairy tale
Bakekano - really funny (warning heavy ecchi)
12 years ago
Posts: 2
I really like Tsuki Tsuki! It's a pretty generic harem but I just love it for some reason. Not that popular as far as I know.
12 years ago
Posts: 19
Though I don't know the degree of unpopularity you're talking about, I'm pretty sure these mangas are not popular enough to be called popular. Sooo, yeah. 😛 😛 😛 Anyway, one is called Sunadokei. It was really touching and practical. Uhmm, and there's this one-shot called GOGGLES. I loved it because it's depressing yet happy at the same time. 😀 😀 😀 Oh! And also another one-shot called Present. (or is it Gift? I'm not so sure, feel free to correct me) It was about a man inlove with his wife and some other stuff too. 🙂 🙂 So, yeah.
What do you desire? Fortune? Glory? Power? Revenge? Or something that surpasses all others? Whatever you desire, that is here. Tower of God.
12 years ago
Posts: 23
My Girl
Koi Kaze (is it real popular?)
Kodomo no Kodomo
and the list goes on...
that's only a few.
Aimless Wanderer
12 years ago
Posts: 34
En Passant
Infinity Game
And a lot more...
12 years ago
Posts: 390
And virtually every series that Tetsuya Saruwatari's ever done.
-GGpX
I run Illuminati-Manga. You're welcome.
12 years ago
Posts: 226
Sunobozu (Desert Punk)
12 years ago
Posts: 47
Hetakoi has got to be one of the best mangas that I have read and I never really ever see anybody mention it.
12 years ago
Posts: 1132
12 years ago
Posts: 240
12 years ago
Posts: 162
seishun for-get. you will fall in love with hinata xD
12 years ago
Posts: 127
Nicoichi
Trinity Seven
12 years ago
Posts: 161