banner_jpg
Username/Email: Password:
Forums

Is peace EVEN possible?

Poll
Is there such a thing as Peace and can it be achieved?
Yes. there is no doubt in my mind
No it's merely an illusion created by those who don't want to accept reality.
Votes: 132

Pages (8) [ 1 2 3 4 5 Last ] Next
You must be registered to post!
From User
Message Body
Post #364242
user avatar
Member

7:41 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 3120


Quote from Mams
...Datsun...

Why Datsun, Mams?
Why choose Datsun as a symbol of peace?

Post #364243 - Reply to (#364242) by Sagaris
user avatar
2nd wave MU user
 Member

7:44 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 7784


Quote from Sagaris
Quote from Mams
...Datsun...

Why Datsun, Mams?
Why choose Datsun as a symbol of peace?

Well, we needed something that might
turn into a sea of flames, ya.

Post #364244 - Reply to (#364243) by Mamsmilk
user avatar
Catnapper
 Member

7:49 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 3503


Quote from Mamsmilk
Quote from Sagaris
Quote from Mams
...Datsun...

Why Datsun, Mams?
Why choose Datsun as a symbol of peace?

Well, we needed something that might
turn into a sea of flames, ya.



Da-tsu-n! I like it! laugh

________________
This week's favorites:

- Golden Kamui





ççççççç[Ô .Ô] tsutopodus© will eat your manga and steal your cats!
user avatar
Member

8:09 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 458


So basically without humans to actually define the concept as peace, the concept itself doesn't exist?
Or at least it doesn't exist as we know it to
Edit- The concept isn't recognized as peace or even as a concept?

Post #364250 - Reply to (#364247) by ExzyruSxxx
user avatar
2nd wave MU user
 Member

8:40 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 7784


Quote from ExzyruSxxx
So basically without humans to actually define the concept as peace, the concept itself doesn't exist?
Or at least it doesn't exist as we know it to
Edit- The concept isn't recognized as peace or even as a concept?

It does not exist as either.
We might have the conditions required for
the concept to exist, but we do not have
anything that can render the concept out
of those conditions.

Let's say we speak of a spoon.

Let us assume a person says "This is a spoon." and does
not have anything in his/her/its hand. Then certainly it is not a spoon.
There is no spoon. Just like there is no peace now in some places
although as well could be.

If we assume a person shows a spoon in his/her hand
and does not know what it is, s/he'll say
"This is... what is it exactly?"
We also assume that us who perceive the situation
do not know what it is either. We also assume that nobody who
is involved with the situation knows it is a spoon.
Meaning as we do not have humans who have the idea of peace,
we now do not have humans who have the idea of spoon.
Since people who perceive
the object as a spoon do not exist and never did exist,
we are not to find out it is a spoon, ever, unless we coincidentally
name it as a spoon, but if we won't, which like is the case,
spoon does not exist and never
did. Other option is that s/he'll see something
else in it, like "Shiney, shiney." and proceeds to scratch one's
back with it or something along those lines.
Therefore it is
just a shiney, although it has everything that a spoon has, since
it is a spoon, but in this case it is not a spoon, because nobody
knows it is a spoon and nobody ever made it to be a spoon,
just like the alliance pact between apes was never made to be
a peace, just something creatures who have the idea of peace
would perceive as peace, as we would say that the shiney is
a spoon, although it is a backscratcher.


Post #364252
user avatar
Member

8:47 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 200


it is not even within the realm of possibility

user avatar
Member Title
Member

9:10 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 46


of course! after the dust and nuclear radiation, earthquakes and tsunamis, and mankind no longer exists then will peace be obtainable and obtained. This should occur a little after WWIII so, those who are anxious for a peace filled world, you wont have much longer to wait.
Spoiler (highlight to view)
THIS IS SARCASM. So dont flame me. It burns. And burns hurt


________________
Signature
user avatar
Bwaaah!
Member

10:06 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 838


Peace is quite possible. Granted you would need to "pacify" vast tracks of the population, automate the majority of functions they once held in society and curtail individual rights but a perfectly boring society of melancholic drones would qualify as a peaceful existence.

user avatar
Madman
 Moderator

10:24 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 3342


This question has no answer.

________________
"“That's the difference between me and the rest of the world!
Happiness isn't good enough for me! I demand euphoria!” "
Post #364274
Member

10:32 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 75


2% chance

user avatar
Lord of nonsense
Member

10:39 pm, Mar 16 2010
Posts: 1310


What has Peace done for you?

Think about it, thanks to conflict we have what we have.

Peace weakens mankind... and we shouldn't work to achieve peace, we should work to BULLY someone else!!!

Mankind is bound to become the bully of the universe, THAT if we don't destroy each other before that.

________________
User Posted Image

User Posted Image
user avatar
Member

12:12 am, Mar 17 2010
Posts: 327


People have tried to attain peace in small numbers and small regions and recently in larger numbers internationally thanks to the internet/improved international communication overall. This has moved some money and aid around...though peace would really depend on your definition, how far it has to extend and how long it has to last.

Concepts in the realm of possibility are not necessarily in the realm of attainability.
Moreso, personally, I think peace would be kind of boring. It sounds like one of those absolute, ideal type situations that vary from person to person but doesn't vary inside a person. Peace would be rigid and foreboding after a while because people would start to get paranoid about accidentally ruining what they have and plunging the world back into un-peace, becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.
...Or maybe I've been reading too much cynical manga...nah...

: D

user avatar
Member

12:33 am, Mar 17 2010
Posts: 101


Of course it is. The world today is a lot less bloodier than it used to be. Technology is slowly eradicating the needs to fight because it is steadily isolating people from each other.

We'll get there eventually.

Post #364285 - Reply to (#364275) by Chaoswind
Member

1:21 am, Mar 17 2010
Posts: 82


I understand what you guys mean about evolution. But have you ever been in a war? I think people who have never suffered anything from war don't have the right to say that war is great or peace is boring... I haven't, but I treasure peace, though I think we'll never be able to achieve it completely. Human's nature is greed.

user avatar
Member

1:32 am, Mar 17 2010
Posts: 88


of course it's possible. . . in theory roll eyes

but really, I think what you refer to is world peace, and quite frankly we don't know what will have happened in say 500 years or more. . . but I think it's unlikely because there will always be imbalances between how much natural resources each country has and people will therefore fight over them, or so I think dead

Pages (8) [ 1 2 3 4 5 Last ] Next
You must be registered to post!