Manga is the Japanese equivalent of comics
with a unique style and following. Join the revolution! Read some manga today!
Join #baka-updates @irc.irchighway.net
RSS Feed
Now, it's true that sources say that some of the manga in question are yaoi. Sure, he may have had some hentai in his vast collection. But that's not the point. He was just going to read them in private in his own home. He didn't commit some heinous crime and rape someone. The issue here is about freedom. Your personal freedom.
The point is this. You decide what you want to read. Some of you (including me) will never read yaoi. Or yuri, or hentai, or gory/bloody stuff like Elfen Lied. That's our choice to make.
But what about this scenario? Your favorite series doesn't have any of that stuff usually. But just one place, in say volume 7, contains a single scene of rape to get the plot going in an interesting direction (mind you, it wasn't that graphic either). Now imagine the authorities busting into your house and arresting you because you own a manga series with that some obscene content here and there.
So how does this apply to you? Naruto has had some pretty graphic deaths before. Same goes for Bleach. You a shoujo fan? Ever read Peach Girl? Now read this news article. You can name many examples taken from your favorite series. I for one can think of scenes from Mahou Sensei Negima!, something I have personally helped scanlate for the last 2-3 years. Or even Gantz, which I know tons of you read. So who draws the line for what you read? You or them?
Now, I know what you're thinking. All your manga is downloaded, so there's no physical evidence of what you're reading. But investigators can check your hard drive or the trail you leave on the internet for what sites you visit. This may just be the beginning to something broader that could affect you in the future. Future technology could make it much harder for you to get your entertainment. Who can say? (Or the unspoken question: When/Will the companies finally crack down on fansubbing and scanlating?)
Or you're saying that you don't read any of that "hardcore" stuff? For sure you're safe... for now... With the current laws, you won't get prosecuted for reading Gantz (at least I hope so). But things can change, possibly for the worst.
So what can you do? I realize that a lot of you aren't even in the United States. But at least some scanlators are. And there are many manga fans here in the US too. I also realize that a lot of us don't have much money. (Or else why would we download illegally for free?) If you feel willing to help monetarily for this court case and future similar cases, you can do so by donating. If not, you can still spread the news to all the manga fans you know. At least I got you thinking. We fans could use better unity.
Or you can totally ignore this and feel it doesn't apply. Your choice.
For more information:
Donation Link
http://www.cbldf.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=2
Background Information
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-10-10/iowa-collector-charged-for-allegedly-obscene-manga
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-11-24/lawyer-indicates-manga-in-iowa-obscenity-case-are-yaoi
Other Editorials
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/editorial/2008-12-11/christopher-handley/jason-thompson
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/editorial/2008-12-11/christopher-handley/carl-horn
This news post does not necessarily reflect the official view of MangaUpdates. This was written by I, lambchopsil, admin of MU. This is meant to get dead fans thinking outside of their own little worlds. There actually IS a global fan base for anime and manga.
Comments (limited to first 100 replies)
» Tenshinchigi on December 12th, 2008, 5:54pm
And yes, that includes drawn pictures too. It was only recently added to Americas laws, and by Bush. But the Amber Alert laws include laws against depictions of Child Pornography. America was actually pretty far behind in the matter, only recently outlawing it, while it's been illegal in other major countries for years.
So It's not just Americans, the rest of the world has to watch out too. Your p0rnz are no longer safe.
» naikan on December 12th, 2008, 6:15pm
» Hikage Idaten on December 12th, 2008, 8:26pm
» Tenshinchigi on December 12th, 2008, 9:00pm
If they look like kids pedo's are gonna jack off to them, it doesn't matter what age they are in context. I mean sure I might be legal at 21, but I look around 12, meaning that any guy who hit's on me is a pedo. They don't know I'm legal so doesn't that mean they think they're hitting on someone underage?
» drunkguy on December 12th, 2008, 9:47pm
Don't know what those panels are but this isn't just about pedophilia anymore. It's about censorship in general. If you care to speak out on that front then I'm sure a lot of people here would like to read it.
» Tenshinchigi on December 13th, 2008, 5:37am
As for the obscenity charge, isn't that only for public displays? Can they really tell you the p0rn you're reading it to hard core?
» drunkguy on December 13th, 2008, 3:10pm
» naikan on December 14th, 2008, 9:27am
» akuma_river on December 12th, 2008, 11:06pm
Kiddy porn, actual porn made with actual kids is illegal. Drawn porn that feature kids on the other hand is not technically porn. Because porn by definition is with real (actually human being) participants.
This has to do with the PROTECT Act and the Miller Test and the new addition of the Adam Walsh Act. The PROTECT Act and parts of the Adam Walsh Act are being contested on grounds of unconstitutionality.
What he's being charged on is obscenity which is done by the Miller Test on what is consider art and what is considered obscene. This is basically censorship.It is damn hard to prove the Miller Test because all three aspects of the Miller Test have to be fulfilled for it to be considered obscene and very rarely all three can be proven. The problem is WHERE this case is taking place. Jury of your peers and all that.
If you are from a religious and conservative place, consider yourself sentenced. If you are from a more liberal and artsy area, you can consider yourself safe.
This all goes down to what is and is not art.
And strictly speaking, not even the Supreme Court can define that and they said so. And this is in the midst of a Bush administration as well.
I think the guy will get off if he was given a fair trial...but with the words "kiddy porn" being tossed about...I'm not so sure anymore.
» Hikage Idaten on December 14th, 2008, 6:16pm
» Invader_Chimp on December 12th, 2008, 5:58pm
» Djamu on December 12th, 2008, 6:45pm
mmm maybe you're right.. no wonder America got the highest % of inmates ...
I wonder who's the sickest ... dumb bible fanatics
» drunkguy on December 12th, 2008, 9:55pm
His defense is that he collected the works based on the fact that he liked the art style. Most of his collection contained mainstream series. Only a few of the manga, perhaps ten, are being cited as containing illicit content in a few panels. If that's true, I'm leaning towards believing him.
» akuma_river on December 12th, 2008, 11:13pm
This is above all a test on what is censorable in the art and comic world. Because they don't like this, it "offends" their sensibilities and they want it gone.
And you know what, the Post Office, had no legal right to search his mail. It's not REAL children, no one is harmed in the making, producing, or in the viewing of this material.
it was an illegal search. They have no grounds.
It is all about censorship.
» RilleL on December 12th, 2008, 6:38pm
He's facing charges for obscenity in manga? First of all, have those guys even read manga?
Secondly, am I the only one having watched hollywood movies? There's plenty of obscenity in there. Or does that only apply to manga? Prejudice, fear and disgust about things you're not familiar with. Now where have I heared that before...
My god there is something really wrong about the american legal system, or maybe moral system.
» Aleph0 on December 12th, 2008, 6:43pm
» channel_49 on December 12th, 2008, 6:43pm
Maybe tomorrow they'll start banning all bishojo because characters never look like they're 18. I'm Canadian, and I hate America and all the late hypocritical shit they pull. I don't read yaoi or loli, but I STILL think this is a load of shit.
» fortune-teller on December 12th, 2008, 6:51pm
» Aeylis on December 12th, 2008, 6:54pm
» Spawnblade on December 12th, 2008, 7:06pm
However this is rather difficult to take in. Particularly because of how many series actually have one scene (as you noted) of some under-aged girl with her shirt off, in the Japanese fashion of odd humor. Also, manwha like Ubel Blatt would fall under this category.
I have no love for the genres that focus on the illicit material, but the fact is that nearly all manga contains objectionable content in some chapter or another. And this case may simply be a gateway to prosecuting those that do not even hold interest in that 'fetish'.
» seraimes on December 12th, 2008, 7:16pm
» Heirojero on December 12th, 2008, 7:16pm
» leoak on December 12th, 2008, 8:05pm
From what I read in the articles, it's not that he had shotacon, but it's the typical issue non-fans have - they can't tell the age/gender of the characters because they don't know anything about the artwork.
Example: My older brother was drinking from a mug with a Viewfinder character on it for months. The entire time, he thought the character was a long haired girl (so did my mom) and freaked when I told him it was actually a guy in his mid 20s. My parents can't, for the life of them, tell you if a character is a girl or guy, much less guess at an age.
I hope someone explains the age/gender issue to the jury at his trial. Yaoi characters do look young (girls don't want to read about two fat, bald 50ish guys getting hot and heavy), but they tend to be university students, business guys or adults. The only exception that might sink him is the high school yaoi. That and him being a guy reading "gay porn" might not go so good with the jury.
As a yaoi fan, the obscenity charges freak me out. I live in the U.S. (in the south of all places!) so I could be total screwed if "gay cartoon porn" was an arrestable offense. Let's face it, even if yaoi passed the Miller Test in the U.S., that fact that it's gay porn in a homophobic country will automatically get you thrown in jail.
» Digital-Eon on December 12th, 2008, 8:13pm
If it's a matter of ambiguity but the characters are clearly adults, or stated to be so, within the plot... that's not illegal. The thing is that what seems normal to most manga readers (sixteen-year-olds having sex in smut, for instance) is not actually normal outside of those fandoms. So what if real sixteen-year-olds are having sex? That's not something you'd see for entertainment (I assume), or at least not with real teenagers.
No one would get arrested for reading stories that feature gay but consenting adults or stories with one questionable scene that is clearly meant to drive the plot. As mentioned above, there must be other reasons.
For the record - you mentioned D.Gray-Man? One of the main characters, at least, is below even the standard age of consent (let alone 18). I have no desire to know anything further on your particular doujinshi, but using that as an example, yes, that's illegal. And it doesn't matter if the 'genre' is done well - underage is underage. It couldn't happen in the real world, after all.
» leoak on December 12th, 2008, 9:37pm
I know I come from an ignorant country, but I would hope my compatriots would have enough brains to realized the difference between a 16 year-old girl and a big eyed, Japanese version of the disproportionate Barbe. Unless you're 5 years old, have some sort of mental impairment or disease, people are capable of recognizing the difference between fantasy and real life. How? It's just as you said, "it couldn't happen in the real world, after all." I'm simply of the opinion that laws shouldn't encroach on fantasy because laws are meant for the real world.
Either way, the whole argument is based on opinion. You'll have the bible thumpers and self-righteous thorns-in-everybody's-side argue that all manga should be burned because of panty shots, short skirts, low cut tops and gay/lesbian relations while others argue artistic freedom/free speech and still others will say "who gives a damn?"
As for getting arrested for reading gay stories... I live in the south. If you don't live in the U.S. or have studied U.S. history from the south, I guess you wouldn't know the situation. Things here can be so backwards, that about two years ago people were trying to re-enforce a law that was still on the books from the Pilgrim days that said unmarried people couldn't live together. Basically, it was against the law to have a live in boyfriend/girlfriend. If that's not bad enough, I played cover for a gay friend the whole four years of high school. Why? Because the guy who was bi was found out and was getting attacked not only by guys, but girls too (teachers weren't fond of him either). So yes, I wouldn't put it pass the courts here to put someone in jail for reading something about gay relationships. Believe me, things are getting so out of hand here, people don't even want to call the police for help anymore.
» drunkguy on December 12th, 2008, 10:14pm
As for teens having sex, yes, it is definitely illegal in the U.S. for people under 18 to engage in pornography. It is not illegal for depictions to be made of completely fictional characters to engage in sexual activity so long as it is not deemed obscene.
The problem is, obscene in the U.S. is far different in comparison to every other part of the world including Japan. Hell, obscene in Iowa is far different from New York, Las Vegas or Florida.
» blibli on December 12th, 2008, 8:08pm
I may not make any sense because I'm pretty damn pissed off...
» willdabeast on December 12th, 2008, 8:30pm
For example, let's say you got 7 locked rooms, and you have 3 keys, and in 2 of those rooms is a molester locked in with a small child. One of the locked doors sits Christopher Handley buying his manga and you already know which door it is but instead of using all 3 of your keys to unlock the other doors you instead open Handley's door and hope you're lucky with the other 2 keys you have left.
These guys aren't out to protect children, they're only trying to make a show of trying to, and it is utterly disgusting the amounts of money they waste in the process. Rant off.
» SwordsRCool on December 12th, 2008, 8:31pm
» ese on December 12th, 2008, 8:46pm
» Elcrane on December 12th, 2008, 9:02pm
Poor guy can't even read in the comfort of his own home, what happened to personal freedom? Why is he the only one arrested? I'm sure there are few hundred (thousands?) more people who probably ordered and bought the same thing. Or was he arrested for being a guy who reads yaoi, but aren't there other guys who read them too.
Guess we should all pack our routers and leave the interweb, who knows what else they might track us down for.
» keikii on December 12th, 2008, 9:10pm
its been a while since i've seen the anime and read the manga, but i'm sure that shuichi does NOT look over 18 in gravitation.
and that's distributed legally by tokyopop. imagine the amount of 14 year old high school girls that could get arrested because they own gravitation.
also, i've read all the gravitation megamixes and remixes. i know what is in those. it's not light material
amazing what this country has gone to do to take away our rights
» lchen on December 12th, 2008, 9:31pm
» leoak on December 12th, 2008, 9:44pm
» Curium on December 12th, 2008, 11:28pm
» bunnyhugger on December 12th, 2008, 11:51pm
» willdabeast on December 12th, 2008, 11:56pm
» akuma_river on December 12th, 2008, 11:41pm
This case really pisses me off because it's the neo-cons with their "child porn" yelling that are trying to impose more restrictions on art and what is obscene. This is not the first case of the PROTECT Act, Adam Walsh Act, and Miller Test.
Do any of you recall the HUGE blow up over the Harry Potter fanart that happened on LiveJournal and spread through the ranks of the online world? This is that exact same situation only the Feds got involved because he ordered his stuff from Japan and it went through the mail which is federal territory.
If this was me, I would be suing the state and the Post Office, they invaded his personal property. The Post Office opened up his mail and then called the Feds and the Feds followed him home. They raided his place looking for ACTUAL child porn, because they were told he was actually buying CHILD PORN. They tore through his place, his computer, and confiscated everything and jailed on the charge of Child porn.
When they couldn't FIND ANY child porn they realized they screwed up. And they had to charge him with something so went with the case. The Judge throw out the charge of child porn, because, hey the guy didn't have any child porn.
But because the stuff offended this religious and conservative area... My god the man is reading GAY COMIC PORN!!! They went with obscenity.
If this was a fair trial, the guy would get off and be able to sue them for defamation of his character, illegal search, etc. But it's not, so he needs all the money he can get.
It's art and if he gets convicted he still fight on grounds of appeal.
Because hey, the PROTECT Act, Adam Walsh Act are being tried on ground of unconstitutionality by the Porn Industry on certain parts that effect the perception of obscenity and art.
There is a lot going on and this just goes to show you that you can NEVER let yourself belief that no one is trying to take away your rights, because the Christian Right, is ALWAYS working to get rid of porn because it OFFENDS them. *snorts*
If nothing else, PROP 8's passing just goes to show that they are willing funnel millions into a cause they believe in.
And nothing offends the Christian Right more than GAY PORN!
» CountMist on December 13th, 2008, 12:12am
...Policy makers try to get reelected by making vague but seemingly morally correct laws, which, in reality, just relocate public funds from current important issues to something with less of a priority.
...Police try to show they are doing something, because they haven't solved the last 50 homicide cases and haven't prosecuted the last hundred sexual offenders.
==== Below is my political view, it has nothing to do with this case, pls don't flame ==========
A simple fund allocation mistake is the Iraq War. Our initial goal after 9/11 was to capture Bin Laden. With the trillions of dollars we poured into Iraq, the US could definitely make a human wall around Afghanistan, and scan the whole country inch by inch. As to how we still haven't captured Bin Laden, it is well beyond any fictional story.
Another example would be the Detroit Big 3. Instead of doing a simple market survey on what consumers really want, they just invested in executives who don't even know how to make a proper proposal (No plan + Private Jet???!! what is this? a relaxing vacation? COME ON)
Below is an article, published by the Law School of Duke University, detailing a US Supreme Court Case on Visual Child Pornography.
http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2002dltr00 19.html
I am begging the state officials to spend our tax money more wisely.
» akuma_river on December 13th, 2008, 3:30am
CCPA got tossed out for being too broad in it's scope, it was replaced with the PROTECT Act in 2003, which is the new and current standard. The Adam Walsh Act added new things to the PROTECT Act and as such parts of the AWA and PROTECT Act are now being tried in cases as unconstitutional. Already parts of the PROTECT Act were tossed out.
So...that link you gave is a bit outdated on the concept.
And the virtual child porn thing was about actual photo-like computer renditions of children. Not drawn figures is...was protected by the PROTECT Act...before the Adam Walsh Act was passed...which counters part of that and upholds it to the Miller Test.
This is the first actual testing of the new acts due to the AWA enforcing and circumventing parts of the PROTECT Act.
Oh and I agree completely. The Right had better stay the hell out of this...I'm just waiting for Viz or Tokyopop to make a stand... Because I know for sure this is not the end and it will come down to money.
» Guest on December 13th, 2008, 12:20am
WARNING: NSFW link
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/12/10/amazon-bans-lolicon-av-eroge-follow/
the world slowly descends back into the dark ages where not only books, but also its author, can be burned for 'violating the laws of god'
somebody must act
» Shuu-chan on December 13th, 2008, 12:24am
» Shuu-chan on December 13th, 2008, 12:27am
» Guest on December 13th, 2008, 12:34am
im living in Indonesia, we just breathe the fresh air of democracy and freedom in 1998. but i fear sooner or later it would be the 'Islamic Republic of Indonesia' if the islamic fundamentalists group here still allowed to roam free and continue lobbying government to apply 'sharia laws'(islamic laws).
heck, two weeks ago our stupid president just signed anti-porn and nudity law, that was protested by many civil rights movements.
» jijiey on December 13th, 2008, 2:24am
» Mr.Two on December 13th, 2008, 3:02am
» jianime_rocks on December 13th, 2008, 3:24am
» mrsatan on December 13th, 2008, 4:25am
» kaeleer on December 13th, 2008, 4:44am
Its just a matter of knowing the laws in your area and its views
» 50carrots on December 13th, 2008, 6:05am
» NightSwan on December 13th, 2008, 6:29am
People can buy all kinds of porn, but not manga?...
I don't live in the US, my country is probably too lazy to bother, and it's a good thing. Who cares what people read behind closed doors...
Fine, protect the children from things they see everywhere by not letting them read manga. Are they trying to do their parents' job?
And besides, since when can people start restricting what others read?
And I'm not talking abut little kids.
This whole thing is absurd...
I agree. How long is it before even the more innocent reading material will be checked, and our privacy will be broken into....
» noisette on December 13th, 2008, 6:39am
I would really like to know just what titles they are referring to in this case.
» Name-Undecided on December 13th, 2008, 6:41am
And if he did, so what? If that's the law, that's the law. If your state law says depictions of sex are obscene, that's what your law says. Rage against it, fine. Try to get it changed, fine. But if you don't want trouble, don't break it.
Silly Americans and their lack of personal responsibility.
» fouloldron on December 13th, 2008, 7:06am
Furthermore, not even lawyers keep upto date on what all the latest amendments and interpretations are. How can an ordinary person be expected to? Particularly when it's just a manga?
I understand you're opinion, but he was being charged with a recent amendment. Which, hilariously, turned out to be unconstitutional.
How can an ordinary citizen obey the law when the lawmakers can't even compose them correctly?
Such a situation could be applied to any country and if you did not know it was illegal, don't think it should be illegal, is it not logical to fight a criminal charge?
However, you are entitled to your opinion.
Ronnie.
» Aleph0 on December 13th, 2008, 12:19pm
I really hope he can sue that dummy postal inspector for anything he's got, because a few mangas - yaoi or otherwise - obviously can't menace the national security so he was acting outside of his remit.
» fouloldron on December 13th, 2008, 6:59am
Also if they are doing such censorship it will have to be applied to all art forms including written works, which can feature some pretty hard stuff.
Personal opinion of course.
O.k. I read Yaoi, Shounen ai and very, very rarely shota (4 to date), and I read 2 of the shota because I really like Haruka Minami and C.J. Michalski and wanted to see what they did with the genre and the other 2 I didn't even realise were shota until I saw the MU classification and went back to check the school uniforms.
Now I respect that many people don't like this.
I don't like Loli or Horror or Hentai, etc.
However, just because I like homosexual manga doesn't mean I condone child abuse or rape.
I certainly would never look at real pornography featuring children.
The mere idea of sexually abusing any one, let alone a child, makes me feel physically ill and emotionally repulsed by the person carrying out such behaviour.
Manga is an art form used to explore all possible representations of a reality.
This is why there are so many genera, each with their own following.
I do think this charge is ridiculous and think that the americans should spend their time and money combating the child trafficing which occurs within their own country.
And if we're really worried about abuse in manga let's start with the ones depicting hard core rape, regardless of gender or age, without any negative consequences, and at least include a page about the real effects of rape in each book.
Furthermore I find that the shota I've encountered mainly features children happily choosing to have sex with each other, not older men preying on children, and the only manga with such a plot point shows it as extremely emotionally damaging for the boy.
My apologies if this was rambling and makes no sense. I'm glad that at least some people are helping him, and glad that I will never live in the US.
Ronnie.
» noisette on December 13th, 2008, 7:10am
http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedo m-of-icky-speech.html
...especially if you're on the fence about whether or not to take up arms for something you really aren't into. Like lolican or yaoi.
Spread the word and donate to the CBLDF if you can!
» vojo85 on December 13th, 2008, 7:58am
My country realy has no problem with what people read so informations like this one can only show me where i dont want to go ever!
» anime_lover122488 on December 13th, 2008, 8:35am
» Catriona on December 13th, 2008, 9:12am
What's with the slogan " The land of the free"? If people have to be afraid of ordering manga (stories made by pictures and such which a slight resemblance to regular comics) just because they might face a trial and prosecution that slogan is the height of hypocrisy.
In that case, do they also prosecute people who read romance novels (where the contents can be quite graphic if I remember correctly) or for that matter Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler (or whatever they're called)? If that's so I'm sure quite a large number of US citizens (teenage boys for example) would probably be standing accused right about now.
It's just sad to see, considering for example that the politics of US (as well as quite a bit of their lifestyle) affects the rest of the world to such a degree.
» kmits on December 13th, 2008, 9:53am
This is why I'm scared to buy manga. I live in a pretty liberal state but a somewhat smaller town, so to get manga I'd have to go to the city or get it through mail. I can't trust that my privacy will be protected so I do neither.
Shouldn't they be spending their time on actual child predators, or stopping people from being forcefully whored for money. There are women, children and men being enslaved in this country and the government is focusing on manga. Do they not have more important issues to take care of.
» Saber on December 13th, 2008, 11:32am
Of all the things that people are concerned about. This is the stupidest. Good money wasted on something so trival. I really hope that that guy gets off. I feel that people should buy and read what they want to read, granted, some genres like yaoi, shota/loli, hentai, horror, etc aren't my thing. But the important thing to remember is that manga is NOT REAL! If they want to charge "obscene" and "objectionable," go charge those buying/downloding real porn.
» noisette on December 13th, 2008, 12:04pm
The prominence of certain social values in public in the US, be they conservative or liberal, life depends a large part in what state you're from; they are not the same in every part of the US. One of the reasons that this happened to this poor guy is that he is from Iowa. Now, Iowa is a very, very, very socially conservative state. A lot of people with openly fundamentalist, evangelical Christian views call Iowa their home. If Christopher Handley was from California, New York, Oregon, Massachusetts or any other socially liberal (usually coastal) state the chances of this happening to him would have been lower to none. Even if he was from a state where politically people are conservative yet generally believe that the best government is little government - New Mexico or Montana, for instance - he probably would be fine. The fact of the matter is that Handley is living in the wrong place at the wrong time. The current presidential administration in this country was in large part built by the Christian Right, and with Bush as president they attained a lot of power in public life (this happened before, too, during the Reagan administration). And they are especially pro-active in places where are lots of people who share their views. Like Iowa (and most of middle, farm-country America). And even if the people who went through Handley's mail aren't religious conservatives, Iowa is still not a place liberal or progressive views about anything from right-to-privacy to same-sex marriage are held by the majority. They will go through your stuff if they think that it is for the better of the "community" (that is, people who think like them).
So that's a large part of how I think this happened at all. And it also one of the main reasons that I think he will be okay in the end. Freedom of Speech is so hotly contested, debated, and defended in this country all the time that in way you could say that this trial is nothing special. It is *very* important for manga and comic readers because is the first that anyone will be prosecuted for actually *owning* obscene material. But not everyone who is going to be helping this dude out are social conservatives from the Mid-west. He's going to have supporters from all over the place with much more progressive views - or should I say, *mainstream views*? Because even if most people do not agree with what someone is saying or enjoying the general attitude most Americans have towards free speech is that it is necessary and fundamental to society and should be preserved at all costs. This is the reason that the Klu Klux Klan is allowed to erect crosses in Fountain Square in my hometown of Cincinnati. Trust me, we *hate* it, hate with a passion. But we know that if we put up a law preventing the Klan from "expressing" themselves (bleh), then that same law could be used to prevent *us* from expressing ourselves in the future. Many people in the US understand that the law does not make neat distinctions, so I think Handley will be cool in the end.
If manga and comic fans in the US get the word out we can drum up a lot of support for this guy. And when Bush leaves office, I know things will change. I don't think that the Christian right is going to be so bold and cocky once their open supporter in the White House leaves ('cause President-Elect Obama sure as hell isn't their friend). But why wait? We should do what we can now! And I would suggest to Mr. Handley, after all of this is done, that he consider moving somewhere else.
» bluegenjutsu on December 13th, 2008, 1:40pm
This guy was not hurting anyone and it's wrong to say that what someone does in private, that doesn't affect/harm other people, is something that the government should be allowed to attack. The one being harmed with the government's case is Handley and the government is not in any way doing this for the protection of anyone. I believe though, that this guy will get off because this case is unconstitutional.
» saxon1231 on December 13th, 2008, 8:03pm
» ALazyCat on December 13th, 2008, 8:07pm
The continual tug-of-war between Public and Private, how to protect kids, how to protect people's views, the average person.
America is a great place, and I mean that very seriously, we have the freedom to challenge the government, we have the freedom to disagree. Yes, we have our limits, and yes, we all disagree with the limits occasionally. When is the government allowed to invade our private lives? When are they allowed to control our public?
Comics aren't necessarily new, in fact, they could be eons old if you're counting the drawings on cave walls, eon perhaps being an over exaggeration in this case. But when Motion Pictures were new, they were denied free speech, subject to a censor board and everything (this was in 1915), because they might be used for evil. Now, to give some credit to the folks of that time, motion pictures have made us generally apathetic toward all of the violence and sex that we see in movies, but that means that our Community Standards have changed as a whole. That court case was a few years ago now, and it's almost the year 2009, so is it right that comics, which as fans of anime and manga, we consider a form of art, a statement, our speech, should they be censored?
» drunkguy on December 14th, 2008, 5:50pm
As for protecting kids, that's what good parenting is for. Saying you can't watch over your kids all of the time is too often used as an excuse to explain away failures instead of working to try to prevent and fix them.
» sefinalishehalif on December 13th, 2008, 8:32pm
» SCKing88 on December 13th, 2008, 9:33pm
» bluegenjutsu on December 13th, 2008, 9:59pm
» willdabeast on December 13th, 2008, 11:22pm
And you also show total ignorance of what being convicted of a sexual act or crime of any nature represents. Even if this guy gets only one month in prison it's very likely he will be on the sexual predator list for the rest of his life. City decides to built a school close to your house? You're going to have to move, too bad. That is not reasonable AT ALL.
» drunkguy on December 14th, 2008, 12:33pm
Personally, while I can understand the disdain some people may feel for the material he may be carrying, honestly, he bought it legitimately from an overseas retailer. It isn't as if he went to a back alley to buy a gun and some crack. It's like he went to a Barnes and Noble, bought a trashy book and got arrested for it. That's what people here are railing against.
» SCKing88 on December 14th, 2008, 1:07pm
» drunkguy on December 14th, 2008, 5:37pm
Valid or not, the guy is innocent until proven guilty and we ain't the jury. It's up to the knuckleheads in the court to do that. That said, if he is ruled guilty, I do hope he gets the twenty years just to illustrate how fucked up the system in Iowa is.
» SCKing88 on December 14th, 2008, 8:53pm
» archspiritadvent on December 13th, 2008, 10:37pm
» bluegenjutsu on December 14th, 2008, 8:43am
» samanthaknd on December 14th, 2008, 9:25am
» MoJo on December 14th, 2008, 10:21am
» magicbulletgirl on December 14th, 2008, 4:30pm
Don't forget that there are some american comics with just as much "obscene" material.
We have pretty lax standards for material and if the facts we are being given, such as that he only had a few volumes of questionable material out of thousands, are true then the charges will be dropped and the manga returned.
I have faith in my justice system.
» archspiritadvent on December 14th, 2008, 5:10pm
» archspiritadvent on December 14th, 2008, 5:11pm
V V V V V
» o0James0o on December 14th, 2008, 3:19pm
it is meaningless to argue anymore, it is just how the nation are...
if it wasn't, how would there be all those banned books?...
now now, to those who live in U.S. or love U.S. or think its awesome or etc... LONG LIVE FREEDOM!!!!!
» natalus on December 14th, 2008, 4:49pm
since i love these stuff
i think, it's better to move to japan
^_^
» Onizuka on December 14th, 2008, 6:05pm
» Hikage Idaten on December 14th, 2008, 6:33pm
- MANGA Fu
- News
- What's New!
- Series Stats
- Forums
- Releases
- Scanlators
- Series Info
- Mangaka
- Publishers
- Reviews
- Genres
- Categories
- FAQ
- Members
- API
- MEMBERS
- Sign Up
- TEAM-BU
- Admin CP
- About Us